Compare Volvo V60 II vs Peugeot 508 SW II (R83) vs Mazda 6 III / Atenza (GJ) facelift

Volvo V60 II

Peugeot 508 SW II (R83)

Mazda 6 III / Atenza (GJ) facelift

Volvo V60 IIPeugeot 508 SW II (R83)Mazda 6 III / Atenza (GJ) facelift
Variants
B3
B4
B5
B5 AWD
B6 AWD
D3
D3 AWD
D3 MT
D4
D4 AWD
D4 MT
Polestar
T4
T5
T5 AWD
T6 AWD
T6 TwEn AWD
T8 TwEn AWD
1.5 BlueHDi 130
1.5 BlueHDi 130 AT
1.6 PureTech 180 AT
1.6 PureTech 225 PHEV
2.0 BlueHDi 160 AT
2.0 BlueHDi 180 AT
GT
PSE
2.0 Skyactiv-G 145PS
2.0 Skyactiv-G 165PS
2.0 Skyactiv-G 165PS AT
2.2 Skyactiv-D 150PS
2.2 Skyactiv-D 150PS 4x4
2.2 Skyactiv-D 150PS AT
2.2 Skyactiv-D 175PS
2.2 Skyactiv-D 175PS 4x4 AT
2.2 Skyactiv-D 175PS AT
2.5 Skyactiv-G AT

Reviews

Neofiliac score62%51%30%
Pros
  • Good styling
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Improved exterior styling
  • Improved interior appointment
  • Handsome styling
  • Great engine lineup
  • 6-speed manual widely available
Cons
  • Only available with small engines
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • MacPherson front suspension
  • No real improvement over pre-facelift

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.