Compare Volvo V60 II vs Alfa Romeo 156 (932) Crosswagon Q4 vs Alfa Romeo 156 (932) Sportwagon

Volvo V60 II

Alfa Romeo 156 (932) Crosswagon Q4

Alfa Romeo 156 (932) Sportwagon

Volvo V60 IIAlfa Romeo 156 (932) Crosswagon Q4Alfa Romeo 156 (932) Sportwagon
Variants
B3
B4
B5
B5 AWD
B6 AWD
D3
D3 AWD
D3 MT
D4
D4 AWD
D4 MT
Polestar
T4
T5
T5 AWD
T6 AWD
T6 TwEn AWD
T8 TwEn AWD
1.6 TS
1.8 TS
1.9 JTD 140
1.9 JTD 105
1.9 JTD 115
2.0 TS
2.0 JTS
2.4 JTD 136
2.4 JTD 150
2.4 JTD 175
2.5 V6 190
2.5 V6 190 AT
2.5 V6 192
2.5 V6 192 AT
2.5 V6 190 AT
3.2 GTA

Reviews

Neofiliac score62%28%33%
Pros
  • Good styling
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
  • Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
  • Beautiful design (though less so than the sedan)
  • Good handling
  • Superb GTA
Cons
  • Only available with small engines
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Really, really ugly
  • Outdated automatic transmission

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.