HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Volvo V60 II vs Ford Focus 4 Wagon vs Ford Mondeo 3 Wagon facelift

Variants
B3
B4
B5
B5 AWD
B6 AWD
D3
D3 AWD
D3 MT
D4
D4 AWD
D4 MT
Polestar
T4
T5
T5 AWD
T6 AWD
T6 TwEn AWD
T8 TwEn AWD
1.0 EcoBoost 100PS
1.0 EcoBoost 125PS
1.0 EcoBoost 125PS AT
1.0 EcoBoost 125PS MHEV
1.0 EcoBoost 155PS MHEV
1.0 EcoBoost 85PS
1.5 EcoBlue 120PS
1.5 EcoBlue 120PS AT
1.5 EcoBlue 95PS
1.5 EcoBoost 150PS
1.5 EcoBoost 150PS AT
1.5 EcoBoost 182PS
2.0 EcoBlue 150PS
2.0 EcoBlue 150PS AT
Focus ST
Focus ST AT
Focus ST Diesel
1.6
1.6 EcoBoost
2.0
2.0 AT
2.0 EcoBoost AT
2.0 TDCi 115PS
2.0 TDCi 140PS
2.0 TDCi 140PS AT
2.0 TDCi 163PS
2.0 TDCi 163PS AT
2.2 TDCi 200PS

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
489 L / 17.3 cu-ft ~ 1680 L / 59.3 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
8.9 L / 9.4 qt
Fuel Capacity
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.6 m / 38.0 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Station Wagon

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
115 mm / 4.5 in
Size | Height
1512 mm / 59.5 in
Size | Length
4761 mm / 187.4 in
4837 mm / 190.4 in
Size | Width
1850 mm / 72.8 in | 2040 mm / 80.3 in (mirror unfolded) | 1916 mm / 75.4 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1593.0 mm / 62.7 in
1572.0 mm / 61.9 in
1588.0 mm / 62.5 in
Track Width | Rear
1593.0 mm / 62.7 in
1566.0 mm / 61.7 in
1605.0 mm / 63.2 in
Wheelbase
2872 mm / 113.1 in
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2850 mm / 112.2 in

Performance

Braking | 100 km/h - 0
35.0 m / 114.8 ft
Coefficient Of Drag
0.29
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1800 kg / 3968 lbs (w/ brakes @ 8% gradient) | 1600 kg / 3527 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d
Euro 5
Engine | Bore
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 120.2 cu-in / 1969.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
93.2 mm / 3.7 in

Production

Availability
2010 ~ 2014

Reviews

Neofiliac score
62%
50%
30%
Pros
  • Good styling
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Focus ST still available
  • Improved, cleaner styling
  • Better handling characteristics
  • Engines with higher output
Cons
  • Only available with small engines
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Questionable styling

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.