Compare Volvo V60 II vs Mercedes-Benz C-Class Estate S205 vs Mercedes-Benz C-Class All-Terrain S206

Volvo V60 II

Mercedes-Benz C-Class Estate S205

Mercedes-Benz C-Class All-Terrain S206

Volvo V60 IIMercedes-Benz C-Class Estate S205Mercedes-Benz C-Class All-Terrain S206
Variants
B3
B4
B5
B5 AWD
B6 AWD
D3
D3 AWD
D3 MT
D4
D4 AWD
D4 MT
Polestar
T4
T5
T5 AWD
T6 AWD
T6 TwEn AWD
T8 TwEn AWD
AMG C 43 4MATIC
AMG C 63
AMG C 63 S
C 160
C 160 MT
C 180 7AT
C 180 9AT
C 180 MT
C 180d
C 180d MT
C 200 4MATIC 7AT
C 200 4MATIC 9AT
C 200 7AT
C 200 9AT
C 200 MT
C 200d
C 200d MT
C 220d 4MATIC
C 220d 7AT
C 220d 9AT
C 220d MT
C 250 7AT
C 250 9AT
C 250d 4MATIC 7AT
C 250d 4MATIC 9AT
C 250d 7AT
C 250d 9AT
C 300 7AT
C 300 9AT
C 300h
C 400 4MATIC
C 200
C 220d

Reviews

Neofiliac score62%86%32%
Pros
  • Good styling
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Double-wishbone / multi-link suspension setup
  • Much more elegant styling
  • 9G-Tronic automatic transmission
  • Good for posing
Cons
  • Only available with small engines
  • Downsized turbo engines
  • Ugly indeed
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • AWD even though unnecessary

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.