Compare Volvo V60 II vs Mercedes-Benz C-Class Estate S203 vs Mercedes-Benz C-Class All-Terrain S206

Volvo V60 II

Mercedes-Benz C-Class Estate S203

Mercedes-Benz C-Class All-Terrain S206

Volvo V60 IIMercedes-Benz C-Class Estate S203Mercedes-Benz C-Class All-Terrain S206
Variants
B3
B4
B5
B5 AWD
B6 AWD
D3
D3 AWD
D3 MT
D4
D4 AWD
D4 MT
Polestar
T4
T5
T5 AWD
T6 AWD
T6 TwEn AWD
T8 TwEn AWD
C 180
C 180 Kompressor
C 180 Kompressor MT
C 180 MT
C 200 CDI
C 200 CDI
C 200 CDI MT
C 200 CDI MT
C 200 CGI MT
C 200 Kompressor Euro4
C 200 Kompressor Euro4 MT
C 200 Kompressor Euro4D
C 200 Kompressor MT
C 220 CDI
C 220 CDI MT
C 240
C 240 4MATIC
C 240 MT
C 270 CDI
C 270 CDI MT
C 30 CDI AMG
C 32 AMG
C 320
C 320 4MATIC
C 320 MT
C 200
C 220d

Reviews

Neofiliac score62%63%32%
Pros
  • Good styling
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • More modern equipment
  • Wide available with 6-speed manual transmission
  • Good powertrain reliability
  • Good for posing
Cons
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Lost V8 engine
  • Diesel nonsense with AMG badge
  • Ugly indeed
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • AWD even though unnecessary

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.