Compare Volvo V60 II vs Toyota Auris 2 Touring Sports vs Renault Megane 4 Grand Tour
Variants
B3
B4
B5
B5 AWD
B6 AWD
D3
D3 AWD
D3 MT
D4
D4 AWD
D4 MT
Polestar
T4
T5
T5 AWD
T6 AWD
T6 TwEn AWD
T8 TwEn AWD
1.3 Dual VVT-i
1.4 D-4D
1.6 Valvematic
1.8 VVT-i Hybrid
2.0 D-4D
1.2 Energy TCe 100PS
1.2 Energy TCe 130PS
1.2 Energy TCe 130PS AT
1.3 TCe 115PS
1.3 TCe 140PS
1.3 TCe 140PS AT
1.3 TCe 160PS
1.3 TCe 160PS AT
1.5 Blue dCi 115PS
1.5 Blue dCi 115PS AT
1.5 Blue dCi 95PS
1.5 Energy dCi 110PS
1.5 Energy dCi 110PS AT
1.5 Energy dCi 90PS
1.6 Energy dCi 130PS
1.6 SCe 115PS
1.7 Blue dCi 150PS AT
1.7 Blue dCi 150PS AT
GT 1.6 Energy dCi AT
GT 1.6 Energy TCe AT
Capacity
Coolant Capacity
8.9 L / 9.4 qt
Fuel Capacity
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent, coil spring
Turning Circle
10.4 m / 34.1 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door Station Wagon
Dimensions
Size | Height
1460 mm / 57.5 in
Size | Length
4761 mm / 187.4 in
4560 mm / 179.5 in
4626 mm / 182.1 in
Size | Width
1850 mm / 72.8 in | 2040 mm / 80.3 in (mirror unfolded) | 1916 mm / 75.4 in (mirror folded)
1760 mm / 69.3 in
1814 mm / 71.4 in | 2058 mm / 81.0 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1593.0 mm / 62.7 in
1535.0 mm / 60.4 in
1591.0 mm / 62.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1593.0 mm / 62.7 in
1586.0 mm / 62.4 in
Wheelbase
2872 mm / 113.1 in
2600 mm / 102.4 in
2712 mm / 106.8 in
Performance
Braking | 100 km/h - 0
35.0 m / 114.8 ft
CO2 Emission
88 g/km
Coefficient Of Drag
0.29
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d
Euro 5 J
Engine | Bore
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 120.2 cu-in / 1969.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
93.2 mm / 3.7 in
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual
Production
Availability
2012 ~ 2015
Reviews
Neofiliac score
62%
28%
14%
Pros
- Good styling
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Low fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
- Good for fuel costs
- Small turning circle
- Reliable drivetrain
- Very low official fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
Cons
- Only available with small engines
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with small engines
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- No independent rear suspensions
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.