HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Volvo V90 facelift vs Toyota Auris 2 Touring Sports vs Fiat Tipo Wagon

Variants
B4
B6 AWD
D3 MT
D3
D3 AWD
D4 MT
D4
D4 AWD
D5 AWD
T5
T6 AWD
T8 AWD
1.3 Dual VVT-i
1.4 D-4D
1.6 Valvematic
1.8 VVT-i Hybrid
2.0 D-4D
1.3 16V MultiJet II
1.3 16V MultiJet II Euro6d
1.4 16V FIRE
1.4 16V FIRE Euro6d
1.4 16V T-Jet EasyPower
1.4 16V T-Jet EasyPower
1.6 16V E.torQ AT
1.6 16V MultiJet II
1.6 16V MultiJet II DDCT
1.6 16V MultiJet II Euro6d
1.6 16V MultiJet II Euro6d DCT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
560 L / 19.8 cu-ft ~ 1526 L / 53.9 cu-ft
550 L / 19.4 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Disc, 322-345 mm
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc, 320 mm
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Tire Size
205/55 R16, 225/40 R18
Turning Circle
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
10.4 m / 34.1 ft
Water Fording
250 mm / 9.8 in

Construction

Battery | Capacity
11.6 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door Station Wagon

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
156 mm / 6.1 in
Size | Height
1478 mm / 58.2 in
1460 mm / 57.5 in
Size | Length
4945 mm / 194.7 in
4560 mm / 179.5 in
4571 mm / 180.0 in
Size | Width
1879 mm / 74.0 in | 2019 mm / 79.5 in (mirror unfolded) | 1895 mm / 74.6 in (mirror folded)
1760 mm / 69.3 in
1792 mm / 70.6 in
Track Width | Front
1617.0 mm / 63.7 in
1535.0 mm / 60.4 in
1542.0 mm / 60.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1618.0 mm / 63.7 in
1543.0 mm / 60.7 in
Wheel Size
17 in, 18 in, 19 in, 20 in, 21 in
16 in, 18 in
Wheelbase
2941 mm / 115.8 in
2600 mm / 102.4 in
2638 mm / 103.9 in

Performance

Braking | 100 km/h - 0
35.0 m / 114.8 ft
CO2 Emission
88 g/km
Coefficient Of Drag
0.30 ~ 0.33
Electric Range
53.0 km / 32.9 mi
Top Speed
180.0 km/h / 111.8 mph

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5 J
Engine | Bore
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 120.2 cu-in / 1969.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
93.2 mm / 3.7 in
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual

Production

Availability
2020
2012 ~ 2015

Reviews

Neofiliac score
69%
28%
24%
Pros
  • Great styling
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Decent handling
  • Good for fuel costs
  • Small turning circle
  • Reliable drivetrain
  • Down to very low official fuel consumption
Cons
  • Limited to low speed
  • Only available with small engines
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspension

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.