Compare Volvo V90 facelift vs Volvo V60 II vs Alfa Romeo 156 (932) Crosswagon Q4

Volvo V90 facelift

Volvo V60 II

Alfa Romeo 156 (932) Crosswagon Q4

Volvo V90 faceliftVolvo V60 IIAlfa Romeo 156 (932) Crosswagon Q4
Variants
B4
B6 AWD
D3 MT
D3
D3 AWD
D4 MT
D4
D4 AWD
D5 AWD
T5
T6 AWD
T8 AWD
B3
B4
B5
B5 AWD
B6 AWD
D3
D3 AWD
D3 MT
D4
D4 AWD
D4 MT
Polestar
T4
T5
T5 AWD
T6 AWD
T6 TwEn AWD
T8 TwEn AWD

Reviews

Neofiliac score69%62%28%
Pros
  • Great styling
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Decent handling
  • Good styling
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
Cons
  • Limited to low speed
  • Only available with small engines
  • Only available with small engines
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Really, really ugly

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.