Compare Volvo V90 facelift vs Ford Focus 4 Wagon facelift vs Ford Focus 3 Wagon

Variants
B4
B6 AWD
D3 MT
D3
D3 AWD
D4 MT
D4
D4 AWD
D5 AWD
T5
T6 AWD
T8 AWD
1.0 EcoBoost 100
1.0 EcoBoost 125
1.0 EcoBoost 125 MHEV
1.0 EcoBoost 125 MHEV AT
1.0 EcoBoost 155 MHEV
1.0 EcoBoost 155 MHEV AT
1.5 EcoBlue 120
1.5 EcoBlue 120 AT
1.5 EcoBlue 95
ST
ST AT
1.6 EcoBoost 150PS
1.6 EcoBoost 182PS
1.6 TDCi 115PS
1.6 TDCi 95PS
1.6 Ti-VCT 105PS
1.6 Ti-VCT 125PS
2.0 TDCi 115PS AT
2.0 TDCi 140PS
2.0 TDCi 140PS AT
2.0 TDCi 163PS
2.0 TDCi 163PS AT
Focus ST

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
560 L / 19.8 cu-ft ~ 1526 L / 53.9 cu-ft
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Disc, 322-345 mm
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc, 320 mm
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
Water Fording
250 mm / 9.8 in

Construction

Battery | Capacity
11.6 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door Station Wagon

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
156 mm / 6.1 in
118 mm / 4.6 in
Size | Height
1478 mm / 58.2 in
1505 mm / 59.3 in
Size | Length
4945 mm / 194.7 in
Size | Width
1879 mm / 74.0 in | 2019 mm / 79.5 in (mirror unfolded) | 1895 mm / 74.6 in (mirror folded)
1825 mm / 71.9 in | 1979 mm / 77.9 in (mirror unfolded) | 1848 mm / 72.8 in (mirror folded)
1823 mm / 71.8 in
Track Width | Front
1617.0 mm / 63.7 in
1567.0 mm / 61.7 in
1544.0 mm / 60.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1618.0 mm / 63.7 in
1556.0 mm / 61.3 in
1534.0 mm / 60.4 in
Wheel Size
17 in, 18 in, 19 in, 20 in, 21 in
Wheelbase
2941 mm / 115.8 in
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2648 mm / 104.3 in

Performance

Braking | 100 km/h - 0
35.0 m / 114.8 ft
Coefficient Of Drag
0.30 ~ 0.33
Electric Range
53.0 km / 32.9 mi
Top Speed
180.0 km/h / 111.8 mph

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d-ISC-FCM
Euro 5
Engine | Bore
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 120.2 cu-in / 1969.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
93.2 mm / 3.7 in

Production

Availability
2020
2022

Reviews

Neofiliac score
69%
38%
31%
Pros
  • Great styling
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Decent handling
  • Decent build quality
  • Not very ugly
  • Independent suspension setup
  • Improved styling
  • Improved fit and finish
  • Higher engine outputs
Cons
  • Limited to low speed
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.