Compare Volvo V90 facelift vs Toyota Auris 2 Touring Sports vs Toyota Caldina 3
Variants
B4
B6 AWD
D3 MT
D3
D3 AWD
D4 MT
D4
D4 AWD
D5 AWD
T5
T6 AWD
T8 AWD
1.3 Dual VVT-i
1.4 D-4D
1.6 Valvematic
1.8 VVT-i Hybrid
2.0 D-4D
1.8
2.0
2.0 AWD
2.0 GT-FOUR
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
560 L / 19.8 cu-ft ~ 1526 L / 53.9 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Disc, 322-345 mm
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc, 320 mm
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Tire Size
195/65 R15
Turning Circle
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
10.4 m / 34.1 ft
10.8 m / 35.4 ft
Water Fording
250 mm / 9.8 in
Construction
Battery | Capacity
11.6 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door Station Wagon
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
156 mm / 6.1 in
Size | Height
1478 mm / 58.2 in
1460 mm / 57.5 in
1445 mm / 56.9 in
Size | Length
4945 mm / 194.7 in
4560 mm / 179.5 in
4510 mm / 177.6 in
Size | Width
1879 mm / 74.0 in | 2019 mm / 79.5 in (mirror unfolded) | 1895 mm / 74.6 in (mirror folded)
1760 mm / 69.3 in
1740 mm / 68.5 in
Track Width | Front
1617.0 mm / 63.7 in
1535.0 mm / 60.4 in
1505.0 mm / 59.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1618.0 mm / 63.7 in
1500.0 mm / 59.1 in
Weight
1240.0 kg / 2733.7 lbs
Wheel Size
17 in, 18 in, 19 in, 20 in, 21 in
Wheelbase
2941 mm / 115.8 in
2600 mm / 102.4 in
2700 mm / 106.3 in
Performance
Braking | 100 km/h - 0
35.0 m / 114.8 ft
CO2 Emission
88 g/km
Coefficient Of Drag
0.30 ~ 0.33
Electric Range
53.0 km / 32.9 mi
Top Speed
180.0 km/h / 111.8 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5 J
Engine | Bore
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 120.2 cu-in / 1969.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
93.2 mm / 3.7 in
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
4-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual
Automatic
Production
Availability
2020
2012 ~ 2015
2002 ~ 2007
Reviews
Neofiliac score
69%
28%
17%
Pros
- Great styling
- Low fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
- Decent handling
- Good for fuel costs
- Small turning circle
- Reliable drivetrain
- Rather potent GT-Four version
- Clean and elegant styling
Cons
- Limited to low speed
- Only available with small engines
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with small engines
- Only available with small engines
- Basic suspension setup
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.