Compare Volvo V90 facelift vs Toyota Auris 2 Touring Sports vs Toyota Mark II Blit

Variants
B4
B6 AWD
D3 MT
D3
D3 AWD
D4 MT
D4
D4 AWD
D5 AWD
T5
T6 AWD
T8 AWD
1.3 Dual VVT-i
1.4 D-4D
1.6 Valvematic
1.8 VVT-i Hybrid
2.0 D-4D
2.5iR-S
2.5iR-V

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
560 L / 19.8 cu-ft ~ 1526 L / 53.9 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
275 kg / 606 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Disc, 322-345 mm
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc, 320 mm
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Double-wishbone
Turning Circle
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
10.4 m / 34.1 ft
Water Fording
250 mm / 9.8 in

Construction

Battery | Capacity
11.6 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door Station Wagon

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
156 mm / 6.1 in
Size | Height
1478 mm / 58.2 in
1460 mm / 57.5 in
1475 mm / 58.1 in
Size | Length
4945 mm / 194.7 in
4560 mm / 179.5 in
4775 mm / 188.0 in
Size | Width
1879 mm / 74.0 in | 2019 mm / 79.5 in (mirror unfolded) | 1895 mm / 74.6 in (mirror folded)
1760 mm / 69.3 in
1760 mm / 69.3 in
Track Width | Front
1617.0 mm / 63.7 in
1535.0 mm / 60.4 in
1495.0 mm / 58.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1618.0 mm / 63.7 in
1475.0 mm / 58.1 in
Wheel Size
17 in, 18 in, 19 in, 20 in, 21 in
Wheelbase
2941 mm / 115.8 in
2600 mm / 102.4 in
2780 mm / 109.4 in

Performance

Braking | 100 km/h - 0
35.0 m / 114.8 ft
CO2 Emission
88 g/km
Coefficient Of Drag
0.30 ~ 0.33
Electric Range
53.0 km / 32.9 mi
Fuel Economy
10.8 L/100km / 21.8 MPG (urban)
Top Speed
180.0 km/h / 111.8 mph

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5 J
Engine | Bore
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 120.2 cu-in / 1969.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
93.2 mm / 3.7 in
71.5 mm / 2.8 in
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
5-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual
Automatic

Production

Availability
2020
2012 ~ 2015
2002 ~ 2006

Reviews

Neofiliac score
69%
28%
39%
Pros
  • Great styling
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Decent handling
  • Good for fuel costs
  • Small turning circle
  • Reliable drivetrain
  • Clean styling
  • Wonderful range of I6 engines
  • Robust powertrain
  • Double-wishbone suspensions all around
Cons
  • Limited to low speed
  • Only available with small engines
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • Not built for luxury
  • Somehow reminds one of a hearse

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.