Compare Ford Mondeo 4 Wagon facelift vs Toyota Avensis 2 Wagon vs Ford Mondeo 3 Wagon facelift
Variants
1.5 EcoBoost 165
1.5 EcoBoost 165 AT
2.0 EcoBlue 120
2.0 EcoBlue 150
2.0 EcoBlue 150 AT
2.0 EcoBlue 190 AT
2.0 EcoBlue 190 AWD AT
2.0 iVCT 187 Hybrid
1.6 VVT-i
1.8 VVT-i
1.8 VVT-i AT
2.0 VTT-i
2.0 D-4D
2.0 VTT-i AT
2.2 D-4D 148hp
2.2 D-4D 175hp
2.4 VVT-i
1.6
1.6 EcoBoost
2.0
2.0 AT
2.0 EcoBoost AT
2.0 TDCi 115PS
2.0 TDCi 140PS
2.0 TDCi 140PS AT
2.0 TDCi 163PS
2.0 TDCi 163PS AT
2.2 TDCi 200PS
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
730 L / 25.8 cu-ft ~ 1605 L / 56.7 cu-ft
520 L / 18.4 cu-ft ~ 1500 L / 53.0 cu-ft
489 L / 17.3 cu-ft ~ 1680 L / 59.3 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
10.5 L / 11.1 qt
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Disc
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Helical spring
Multi-link
Turning Circle
12.4 m / 40.7 ft
10.1 m / 33.1 ft
11.6 m / 38.0 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
1.4 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon
Dimensions
Size | Height
1501 mm / 59.1 in
1525 mm / 60.0 in
1512 mm / 59.5 in
Size | Length
4869 mm / 191.7 in
4700 mm / 185.0 in
4837 mm / 190.4 in
Size | Width
2121 mm / 83.5 in (mirror unfolded) | 1911 mm / 75.2 in (mirror folded)
1760 mm / 69.3 in
Track Width | Front
1505.0 mm / 59.3 in
1588.0 mm / 62.5 in
Track Width | Rear
1605.0 mm / 63.2 in
Wheelbase
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2850 mm / 112.2 in
Performance
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1800 kg / 3968 lbs (w/ brakes @ 8% gradient) | 1600 kg / 3527 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d
Euro 4
Euro 5
Production
Availability
2019 ~ 2022
2010 ~ 2014
Reviews
Neofiliac score
32%
18%
30%
Pros
- Decent interior appointment
- Decent build quality
- Independent rear suspensions
- Small turning circle
- Rather reliable
- Engines with higher output
Cons
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Basic suspensions setup
- Design hasn't aged well
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Questionable styling
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.