Compare Peugeot 308 SW III vs Peugeot 308 SW II vs Peugeot 508 SW

Variants
1.2 PureTech 110
1.2 PureTech 130
1.2 PureTech 130 AT
1.5 BlueHDi 130
1.5 BlueHDi 130 Hp) EAT8
1.6 PureTech Hybrid 180
1.6 PureTech Hybrid 225
1.2 PureTech 110PS
1.2 PureTech 110PS Euro6d
1.2 PureTech 110PS 2017-2018
1.2 PureTech 130PS Euro6d
1.2 PureTech 130PS 2017-2018
1.2 PureTech 130PS
1.2 PureTech 130PS AT
1.2 PureTech 130PS AT 2017-2018
1.2 PureTech 130PS AT Euro6d
1.5 BlueHDi 102PS
1.5 BlueHDi 130PS
1.5 BlueHDi 130PS AT
1.6 BlueHDi 100PS
1.6 BlueHDi 120PS 2017-2018
1.6 BlueHDi 120PS
1.6 BlueHDi 120PS AT 2017-2018
1.6 BlueHDi 120PS AT
1.6 BlueHDi 99PS
1.6 e-HDi
1.6 HDi
1.6 PureTech AT
1.6 THP
2.0 BlueHDi 150PS
2.0 BlueHDi 150PS 2017-2018
2.0 BlueHDi 150PS AT
2.0 BlueHDi 177PS AT
GT 1.6 THP
GT 2.0 BlueHDi AT
GT 2.0 BlueHDi 2017-2018
1.6 e-HDi
1.6 HDi
1.6 THP
1.6 THP AT
1.6 VTi
2.0 HDi 140PS
2.0 HDi 163PS
2.0 HDi 163PS AT
2.2 HDi AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
610 L / 21.5 cu-ft ~ 1660 L / 58.6 cu-ft
560 L / 19.8 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
72.0 L / 19.0 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion
Semi-independent, coil spring
Multi-link
Turning Circle
10.9 m / 35.8 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon

Dimensions

Size | Height
1444 mm / 56.9 in
1476 mm / 58.1 in
Size | Length
4636 mm / 182.5 in
4585 mm / 180.5 in
4813 mm / 189.5 in
Size | Width
1852 mm / 72.9 in | 2062 mm / 81.2 in (mirror unfolded) | 1860 mm / 73.2 in (mirror folded)
1920 mm / 75.6 in
Track Width | Front
1559.0 mm / 61.4 in
Wheelbase
2732 mm / 107.6 in
2730 mm / 107.5 in
2817 mm / 110.9 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.277
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1450 kg / 3197 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5

Production

Availability
2021
2010 ~ 2014

Reviews

Neofiliac score
31%
15%
21%
Pros
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Improved styling
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Not ugly anymore
  • Much better-looking than the 407 SW
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Poor suspension setup
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.