Compare Peugeot 308 SW III vs Peugeot 508 SW facelift vs Peugeot 308 SW II
Variants
1.2 PureTech 110
1.2 PureTech 130
1.2 PureTech 130 AT
1.5 BlueHDi 130
1.5 BlueHDi 130 Hp) EAT8
1.6 PureTech Hybrid 180
1.6 PureTech Hybrid 225
1.6 BlueHDi
1.6 BlueHDi AT
1.6 e-HDi
1.6 e-HDi AT
1.6
1.6 AT
1.6 VTi AT
2.0 BlueHDi 150PS
2.0 BlueHDi 180PS AT
2.0 HDi 140PS
2.0 HDi 163PS
2.0 HDi 163PS AT
2.2 HDi AT
1.2 PureTech 110PS
1.2 PureTech 110PS Euro6d
1.2 PureTech 110PS 2017-2018
1.2 PureTech 130PS Euro6d
1.2 PureTech 130PS 2017-2018
1.2 PureTech 130PS
1.2 PureTech 130PS AT
1.2 PureTech 130PS AT 2017-2018
1.2 PureTech 130PS AT Euro6d
1.5 BlueHDi 102PS
1.5 BlueHDi 130PS
1.5 BlueHDi 130PS AT
1.6 BlueHDi 100PS
1.6 BlueHDi 120PS 2017-2018
1.6 BlueHDi 120PS
1.6 BlueHDi 120PS AT 2017-2018
1.6 BlueHDi 120PS AT
1.6 BlueHDi 99PS
1.6 e-HDi
1.6 HDi
1.6 PureTech AT
1.6 THP
2.0 BlueHDi 150PS
2.0 BlueHDi 150PS 2017-2018
2.0 BlueHDi 150PS AT
2.0 BlueHDi 177PS AT
GT 1.6 THP
GT 2.0 BlueHDi AT
GT 2.0 BlueHDi 2017-2018
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
610 L / 21.5 cu-ft ~ 1660 L / 58.6 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
72.0 L / 19.0 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion
Multi-link
Semi-independent, coil spring
Turning Circle
12.2 m / 40.0 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
148 mm / 5.8 in
Size | Height
1444 mm / 56.9 in
Size | Length
4636 mm / 182.5 in
4829 mm / 190.1 in
4585 mm / 180.5 in
Size | Width
1852 mm / 72.9 in | 2062 mm / 81.2 in (mirror unfolded) | 1860 mm / 73.2 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1559.0 mm / 61.4 in
1579.0 mm / 62.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1552.0 mm / 61.1 in
Wheelbase
2732 mm / 107.6 in
2817 mm / 110.9 in
2730 mm / 107.5 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.277
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1450 kg / 3197 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Production
Availability
2021
Reviews
Neofiliac score
31%
27%
15%
Pros
- Good 0.27 drag coefficient
- Low fuel consumption
- Improved styling
- Improved front-end design
- Low official fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
- Not ugly anymore
Cons
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Poor suspension setup
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- No independent rear suspensions
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.