Compare Peugeot 308 SW III vs Peugeot 207 SW vs Peugeot 308 SW III
Variants
1.2 PureTech 110
1.2 PureTech 130
1.2 PureTech 130 AT
1.5 BlueHDi 130
1.5 BlueHDi 130 Hp) EAT8
1.6 PureTech Hybrid 180
1.6 PureTech Hybrid 225
1.4
1.4 VTi
1.6 HDi 109PS
1.6 HDi 90PS
1.6 RC
1.6 VTi
1.6 VTi AT
1.2 PureTech 110
1.2 PureTech 130
1.2 PureTech 130 AT
1.5 BlueHDi 130
1.5 BlueHDi 130 Hp) EAT8
1.6 PureTech Hybrid 180
1.6 PureTech Hybrid 225
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
337 L / 11.9 cu-ft ~ 1258 L / 44.4 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent, Torsion
Turning Circle
10.8 m / 35.4 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door Station Wagon
Dimensions
Size | Height
1444 mm / 56.9 in
1527 mm / 60.1 in
1444 mm / 56.9 in
Size | Length
4636 mm / 182.5 in
4156 mm / 163.6 in
4636 mm / 182.5 in
Size | Width
1852 mm / 72.9 in | 2062 mm / 81.2 in (mirror unfolded) | 1860 mm / 73.2 in (mirror folded)
1748 mm / 68.8 in | 1972 mm / 77.6 in (mirror unfolded) | 1818 mm / 71.6 in (mirror folded)
1852 mm / 72.9 in | 2062 mm / 81.2 in (mirror unfolded) | 1860 mm / 73.2 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1559.0 mm / 61.4 in
1467.0 mm / 57.8 in
1559.0 mm / 61.4 in
Track Width | Rear
1461.0 mm / 57.5 in
Wheelbase
2732 mm / 107.6 in
2540 mm / 100.0 in
2732 mm / 107.6 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.277
0.3
0.277
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1450 kg / 3197 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1450 kg / 3197 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Production
Availability
2021
2007 ~ 2009
2021
Reviews
Neofiliac score
31%
3%
31%
Pros
- Good 0.27 drag coefficient
- Low fuel consumption
- Improved styling
- Easy to DIY
- Parts are cheap
- Good 0.27 drag coefficient
- Low fuel consumption
- Improved styling
Cons
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Poor suspension setup
- Only available with small engines
- No independent rear suspension
- Very ugly
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Poor suspension setup
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.