Compare Jaguar XF Sportbrake X260 facelift vs Volvo V90 Cross Country vs Jaguar XF Sportbrake X260
Variants
20d
20d AWD
25t
30t AWD
D4
D4 Euro6d
D4 AT
D4 Euro6d AT
D5 Euro6d AT
D5 AT
T5 AT
T5 Euro6d AT
T5 AT
T6 Euro6d AT
T6 AT
2.0 AT
2.0 AWD AT
2.0d 163PS
2.0d 163PS AT
2.0d 180PS AT
2.0d 180PS AWD AT
2.0d 240PS AWD AT
20d AT
20d AWD AT
25d AWD AT
25t AT
3.0 AWD AT
3.0d AT
30d AWD AT
30t AWD AT
E-Performance
E-Performance AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
565 L / 20.0 cu-ft ~ 1700 L / 60.0 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs, 325 mm
Offroad | Approach Angle
18.9 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
17.7 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
20.7 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.6 m / 37.9 ft
11.9 m / 39.2 ft
Water Fording
300 mm / 11.8 in
Construction
Body Style
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
210 mm / 8.3 in
Size | Height
1494 mm / 58.8 in
1543 mm / 60.7 in
1496 mm / 58.9 in
Size | Length
4964 mm / 195.4 in
4939 mm / 194.4 in
4955 mm / 195.1 in
Size | Width
2089 mm / 82.2 in (mirror unfolded) | 1982 mm / 78.0 in (mirror folded)
1879 mm / 74.0 in | 2052 mm / 80.8 in (mirror unfolded)
1987 mm / 78.2 in | 2091 mm / 82.3 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1602.0 mm / 63.1 in
1652.0 mm / 65.0 in
1605.0 mm / 63.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1604.0 mm / 63.1 in
1643.0 mm / 64.7 in
1607.0 mm / 63.3 in
Wheelbase
2960 mm / 116.5 in
2941 mm / 115.8 in
2960 mm / 116.5 in
Performance
Braking | 100 km/h - 0
35.0 m / 114.8 ft
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 121.9 cu-in / 1997.0 cc
2.0 L / 120.2 cu-in / 1969.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
92.3 mm / 3.6 in
93.2 mm / 3.7 in
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic ZF
Production
Availability
2020
Reviews
Neofiliac score
69%
34%
70%
Pros
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Great styling
- Not as offensive as some "uglified" station wagons (e.g. from Merc / VW)
- Small displacement = lower tax
- Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
- Good towing capacity
- Beautiful design (though barely updated)
- Manual transmission more widely available
Cons
- Only available with small engines
- Long-term reliability concerns
- Plasticky
- Only available with small engines
- Ugly plastics
- Still can't go offroad
- Question on long-term engine reliability
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.