HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Fiat 500 facelift vs Kia Rio 4 facelift vs Kia Rio III 3-door

Variants
0.9 TwinAir 105
0.9 TwinAir 85
0.9 TwinAir 85 Euro6d
0.9 TwinAir 85 AT
0.9 TwinAir 85 Euro6d AT
1.0 70
1.2 69
1.2 69 Euro6d
1.2 69 AT
1.2 69 Euro6d AT
1.3 MultiJet 95
1.4 MultiAir 135
1.4 MultiAir 135 AT
1.0 T-GDI 101
1.0 T-GDI 101 DCT
1.0 T-GDI 120
1.0 T-GDI 120 DCT
1.2 84
1.1 CRDi
1.2
1.4
1.4 AT
1.4 CRDi

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
325 L / 11.5 cu-ft ~ 1103 L / 39.0 cu-ft
288 L / 10.2 cu-ft ~ 923 L / 32.6 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
43.0 L / 11.4 gal
Passengers
4
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent
Semi-independent, Elastic beam
Semi-independent, coil spring
Tire Size
185/65 R15, 195/55 R16, 205/45 R17
Turning Circle
10.2 m / 33.5 ft
10.5 m / 34.4 ft

Construction

Body Style
3-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
114 mm / 4.5 in
Size | Height
1450 mm / 57.1 in
1455 mm / 57.3 in
Size | Length
4050 mm / 159.4 in
Size | Width
1725 mm / 67.9 in | 1993 mm / 78.5 in (mirror unfolded)
1720 mm / 67.7 in | 1985 mm / 78.1 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1512.0 mm / 59.5 in
1507.0 mm / 59.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1518.0 mm / 59.8 in
1511.0 mm / 59.5 in
Wheel Size
5.5J x 15, 6.0J x 16, 6.5J x 17
Wheelbase
2300 mm / 90.6 in
2580 mm / 101.6 in
2570 mm / 101.2 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.362

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d-ISC-FCM
Euro 6
Engine | Bore
71.0 mm / 2.8 in
Engine | Redline
6500 rpm

Production

Availability
2020
2012 ~ 2017

Reviews

Neofiliac score
25%
17%
22%
Pros
  • Great styling
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Small turning circle
  • Decent styling
  • Low official fuel consumption
Cons
  • Horrible performance
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • High 0.36 drag coefficient
  • Poor suspension setup
  • Horrible performance
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Poor suspension setup
  • Low build quality
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.