HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Fiat 500 facelift vs Fiat Bravo 198 vs Fiat 500L Living

Variants
0.9 TwinAir 105
0.9 TwinAir 85
0.9 TwinAir 85 Euro6d
0.9 TwinAir 85 AT
0.9 TwinAir 85 Euro6d AT
1.0 70
1.2 69
1.2 69 Euro6d
1.2 69 AT
1.2 69 Euro6d AT
1.3 MultiJet 95
1.4 MultiAir 135
1.4 MultiAir 135 AT
1.4
1.4 MultiAir
1.4 T-Jet 120
1.4 T-Jet 150
1.6 Multijet 105
1.6 Multijet 120
1.6 Multijet 90
1.9 MultiJet 120
1.9 MultiJet 150
2.0 Multijet
0.9 TwinAir 105
0.9 TwinAir 80
1.3 MultiJet II 85
1.4 T-Jet
1.6 MultiJet 105
1.6 MultiJet 120

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
400 L / 14.1 cu-ft ~ 1175 L / 41.5 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
57.0 L / 15.1 gal
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
Passengers
4
5
7
Payload
510 kg / 1124 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Tire Size
205/55 R16, 225/45 R17
Turning Circle
10.4 m / 34.1 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Hatchback
5-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
114 mm / 4.5 in
Size | Height
1498 mm / 59.0 in
1667 mm / 65.6 in
Size | Length
4336 mm / 170.7 in
4352 mm / 171.3 in
Size | Width
1792 mm / 70.6 in
1784 mm / 70.2 in
Track Width | Front
1538.0 mm / 60.6 in
1522.0 mm / 59.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1532.0 mm / 60.3 in
1519.0 mm / 59.8 in
Wheel Size
6.5J x 16, 7J x 17
Wheelbase
2300 mm / 90.6 in
2600 mm / 102.4 in
2612 mm / 102.8 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.362

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Redline
6500 rpm

Reviews

Neofiliac score
25%
28%
22%
Pros
  • Great styling
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Small turning circle
  • Decent, punchy engines
  • Good manual transmission
  • Decent exterior design
  • Lots of interior space
Cons
  • Horrible performance
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • High 0.36 drag coefficient
  • Poor suspension setup
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.