Compare Toyota Prius 4 facelift vs Subaru Impreza 4 Hatchback vs Toyota Matrix E130
Variants
FWD
AWD
1.6i AWD
1.6i AWD CVT
1.6i FWD
1.6i FWD CVT
2.0i AWD
2.0i AWD CVT
1.8 124PS AWD
1.8 124PS AWD AT
1.8 132PS
1.8 132PS AT
1.8 183PS
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
501 L / 17.7 cu-ft ~ 1633 L / 57.7 cu-ft
617 L / 21.8 cu-ft ~ 1507 L / 53.2 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
5.4 L / 5.7 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.2 L / 4.4 qt
4.8 L / 5.1 qt
Fuel Capacity
43.0 L / 11.4 gal
55.0 L / 14.5 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Tire Size
205/55 R16
Turning Circle
10.2 m / 33.5 ft
9.8 m / 32.1 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
1.3 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door hybrid Hatchback
5-door Hatchback
5-door Station Wagon
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
145 mm / 5.7 in
Size | Height
1465 mm / 57.7 in
1540 mm / 60.6 in
Size | Length
4575 mm / 180.1 in
4350 mm / 171.3 in
Size | Width
1760 mm / 69.3 in
1740 mm / 68.5 in
1775 mm / 69.9 in
Track Width | Front
1510.0 mm / 59.4 in
Track Width | Rear
1515.0 mm / 59.6 in
Wheel Size
16 in
Wheelbase
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2645 mm / 104.1 in
2600 mm / 102.4 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.24
Towing Capacity
725 kg / 1598 lbs (w/o brakes) | 725 kg / 1598 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Emission Standard
Euro 6 AG
Euro 6
Engine
2ZR-FXE
Engine | Bore
80.5 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
13.0:1
10.5:1
Engine | Displacement
1.8 L / 109.7 cu-in / 1798.0 cc
Engine | Specific Output
53.9 hp/L / 0.9 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
88.3 mm / 3.5 in
Engine | Torque
142 Nm / 104.7 lb-ft @ 3600 rpm + 163 Nm / 120.2 lb-ft
Engine | Type
multi-port injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Type
e-CVT
Production
Availability
2018
2002 ~ 2007
Reviews
Neofiliac score
55%
42%
16%
Pros
- Excellent 0.24 drag coefficient
- Small turning circle
- Super reliability
- Low fuel consumption
- Much sleeker styling
- Higher engine output
- Small turning circle
- Reliable engines
Cons
- Poor performance
- Miserably low engine output
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- No powerful engine options
- Bad CVT
- No powerful engine options
- Boring design
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.