Compare Volkswagen Up facelift vs Volkswagen Cross Up vs Skoda Fabia 2

Volkswagen Up / Skoda Citigo / SEAT Mii facelift Hatchback (2016)

Volkswagen Cross Up Hatchback (2013-2019)

Skoda Fabia 2 (5J) Hatchback (2007-2014)

Volkswagen | Cars

Skoda | Cars

Variants

1.0 60

1.0 60 ASG

1.0 75

1.0 75 ASG

1.0 75 Euro6d

1.0 EcoFuel 68

1.0 EcoFuel 68 Euro6d

1.0 MPI 65

1.0 TSI 90

1.0 TSI 90 Euro6d

GTI

GTI Euro6d

1.0

1.0 Euro6

1.0 Euro6d

1.0 Euro6 AT

1.0 Euro6d AT

1.0 AT

1.0 TSI

1.0 TSI Euro6d

1.2 60 Euro5

1.2 70 Euro5

1.2 60

1.2 70

1.2 TDI 75

1.2 TSI 105

1.2 TSI 105 DSG

1.2 TSI 86

1.4 86 Euro5

1.4 86

1.4 TDI 70

1.4 TDI 80

1.6 105

1.6 105 AT

1.6 TDI 105

1.6 TDI 75

1.6 TDI 90

1.9 TDI 105

Capacity

Fuel Capacity

35.0 L / 9.2 gal

45.0 L / 11.9 gal

Passengers

Chassis

Brakes | Front

Ventilated discs

Brakes | Rear

Disc

Power Steering

Electric Steering

Suspension | Front

MacPherson strut

Suspension | Rear

Semi-independent

Semi-independent, Torsion beam

Semi-independent, Torsion

Tire Size

165/70 R14, 185/55 R15, 185/50 R16, 195/40 R17

Turning Circle

9.8 m / 32.1 ft

10.0 m / 32.8 ft

Construction

Body Style

3-5-door Hatchback

4-door Hatchback

5-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance

144 mm / 5.7 in

162 mm / 6.4 in

135 mm / 5.3 in

Size | Height

1516 mm / 59.7 in

1498 mm / 59.0 in

Size | Length

3600 mm / 141.7 in

Size | Width

1642 mm / 64.6 in

Track Width | Front

1412.0 mm / 55.6 in

Track Width | Rear

1408.0 mm / 55.4 in

Wheel Size

5J x 14, 5.5J x 15, 6J x 16, 6.5J x 17

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag

0.33

Towing Capacity

500 kg / 1102 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1200 kg / 2646 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout

Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive

Engine | Displacement

1.0 L / 61.0 cu-in / 999.0 cc

Transmission | Gears

5-speed

Reviews

Neofiliac score

11%

Pros

Low fuel consumption
Small turning circle

Ugly enough to be theft-proof
Small turning circle

Very low official fuel consumption
Small turning circle

Cons

Horrible performance
Miserably low engine output
Only available with tiny engines
Poor suspension setup

Horrible 0-100kph time
Can't even reach 200km/h
Miserably low engine output
Only available with tiny engines
Semi-independent rear suspensions

No powerful engine options
Only available with small, unreliable engines
No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)

Remove

Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above

Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.