HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Kia Rio 4 facelift vs Fiat Punto 199 vs Fiat 500 facelift

Variants
1.0 T-GDI 101
1.0 T-GDI 101 DCT
1.0 T-GDI 120
1.0 T-GDI 120 DCT
1.2 84
0.9 TwinAir 105
0.9 TwinAir 85
1.2 69
1.3 Multijet 85
1.3 Multijet 95
1.4 77
1.4 MultiAir 105
1.4 T-Jet 135
0.9 TwinAir 105
0.9 TwinAir 85
0.9 TwinAir 85 Euro6d
0.9 TwinAir 85 AT
0.9 TwinAir 85 Euro6d AT
1.0 70
1.2 69
1.2 69 Euro6d
1.2 69 AT
1.2 69 Euro6d AT
1.3 MultiJet 95
1.4 MultiAir 135
1.4 MultiAir 135 AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
325 L / 11.5 cu-ft ~ 1103 L / 39.0 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
4

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Elastic beam
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent
Turning Circle
10.2 m / 33.5 ft

Construction

Body Style
3/5-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
114 mm / 4.5 in
Size | Height
1450 mm / 57.1 in
Size | Length
4065 mm / 160.0 in
Size | Width
1725 mm / 67.9 in | 1993 mm / 78.5 in (mirror unfolded)
1687 mm / 66.4 in
Track Width | Front
1512.0 mm / 59.5 in
1473.0 mm / 58.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1518.0 mm / 59.8 in
1466.0 mm / 57.7 in
Wheelbase
2580 mm / 101.6 in
2510 mm / 98.8 in
2300 mm / 90.6 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.34
0.362
Towing Capacity
400 kg / 882 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1000 kg / 2205 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d-ISC-FCM
Engine | Bore
71.0 mm / 2.8 in
Engine | Redline
6500 rpm
Transmission | Type
Manual

Production

Availability
2020

Reviews

Neofiliac score
17%
16%
25%
Pros
  • Small turning circle
  • Decent styling
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Great styling
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
Cons
  • Horrible performance
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Poor suspension setup
  • Low build quality
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Horrible performance
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • High 0.36 drag coefficient
  • Poor suspension setup

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.