Compare Ford Focus 4 facelift vs Kia Rio 4 facelift vs Kia Pro Cee'd
Variants
1.0 EcoBoost 100
1.0 EcoBoost 125
1.0 EcoBoost 125 AT
1.0 EcoBoost 155
1.0 EcoBoost 155 AT
1.5 EcoBlue 120
1.5 EcoBlue 120 AT
1.5 EcoBlue 95
ST 2.3 EcoBoost 280
ST 2.3 EcoBoost 280 AT
1.0 T-GDI 101
1.0 T-GDI 101 DCT
1.0 T-GDI 120
1.0 T-GDI 120 DCT
1.2 84
1.4
1.6
1.6 AT
1.6 CRDi 115
1.6 CRDi 115 AT
1.6 CRDi 128
1.6 CRDi 128 AT
1.6 CRDi 90
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
325 L / 11.5 cu-ft ~ 1103 L / 39.0 cu-ft
340 L / 12.0 cu-ft ~ 1210 L / 42.7 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
53.0 L / 14.0 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent, Elastic beam
Semi-independent, Torsion bar
Tire Size
185/65 R15, 195/65 R15, 205/55 R16
Turning Circle
11.0 m / 36.1 ft
10.2 m / 33.5 ft
10.3 m / 33.9 ft
Construction
Body Style
3-door Hatchback
Dimensions
Size | Height
1450 mm / 57.1 in
1450 mm / 57.1 in
Size | Length
4250 mm / 167.3 in
Size | Width
1825 mm / 71.9 in | 1979 mm / 77.9 in (mirror unfolded) | 1848 mm / 72.8 in (mirror folded)
1725 mm / 67.9 in | 1993 mm / 78.5 in (mirror unfolded)
1790 mm / 70.5 in
Track Width | Front
1567.0 mm / 61.7 in
1512.0 mm / 59.5 in
Track Width | Rear
1556.0 mm / 61.3 in
1518.0 mm / 59.8 in
Wheel Size
15 in, 16 in
Wheelbase
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2580 mm / 101.6 in
2650 mm / 104.3 in
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d-ISC-FCM
Euro 6d-ISC-FCM
Euro 5
Engine | Bore
71.0 mm / 2.8 in
Production
Availability
2022
2020
2006 ~ 2012
Reviews
Neofiliac score
34%
17%
27%
Pros
- Good handling
- Decent build quality
- Small turning circle
- Decent styling
- Small turning circle
- Elegant styling
- Independent rear suspensions
Cons
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Generic styling
- Horrible performance
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with tiny engines
- Poor suspension setup
- Low build quality
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with tiny engines
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.