Compare Citroen C1 II 5-door vs Citroen DS3 vs Citroen C3 III facelift
Variants
1.0 69
1.0 69 ETG
1.0 72
1.0 72 ETG
1.2 82
Airscape 1.0 72
1.2 e-VTi PureTech ETG
1.2 PureTech 110
1.2 PureTech 82
1.2 PureTech 82 ETG
1.4 e-HDi 70 ETG
1.4 HDi 70
1.4 VTi 95 ETG
1.4 VTi 95 GPL
1.4 VTi Airdream 95
1.6 BlueHDi 100
1.6 BlueHDi 120
1.6 e-HDi 110
1.6 e-HDi 115
1.6 e-HDi 90
1.6 e-HDi 90 ETG
1.6 HDi 110
1.6 THP 150
1.6 THP 165
1.6 VTi 120
1.6 VTi 120 AT
Racing 1.6 T 202
Racing 1.6 T 207
1.2 110
1.2 110 AT
1.2 83
1.5 HDi 102
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
196 L / 6.9 cu-ft ~ 780 L / 27.5 cu-ft
300 L / 10.6 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
3.6 L / 3.8 qt
Fuel Capacity
35.0 L / 9.2 gal
Passengers
4
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, Elastic beam
Turning Circle
9.6 m / 31.5 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door Hatchback
3-door Hatchback
5-door Hatchback
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
120 mm / 4.7 in
Size | Height
1460 mm / 57.5 in
1474 mm / 58.0 in
Size | Length
3466 mm / 136.5 in
3996 mm / 157.3 in
Size | Width
1615 mm / 63.6 in | 1884 mm / 74.2 in (mirror unfolded)
1749 mm / 68.9 in | 2007 mm / 79.0 in (mirror unfolded) | 1829 mm / 72.0 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1471.0 mm / 57.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1471.0 mm / 57.9 in
Wheel Size
15 in, 16 in, 17 in
Wheelbase
2340 mm / 92.1 in
2464 mm / 97.0 in
2539 mm / 100.0 in
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d-ISC
Engine | Bore
75.0 mm / 3.0 in
Transmission | Gears
5-speed
Production
Availability
2020
Reviews
Neofiliac score
14%
21%
8%
Pros
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Low fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
- Low official fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
- Less ugly than the C3
- Low fuel consumption
Cons
- Horrible performance
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with tiny engines
- Poor suspension setup
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Horrible performance
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with tiny engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Low cargo capacity
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.