Compare Citroen C1 II 3-door vs Citroen C3 III facelift vs Citroen C1 II 3-door

Variants
1.0 69
1.0 69 AT
1.2 82
1.0 72
1.0 72 Euro6d
1.2 110
1.2 110 AT
1.2 83
1.5 HDi 102
1.0 69
1.0 69 AT
1.2 82
1.0 72
1.0 72 Euro6d

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
196 L / 6.9 cu-ft ~ 780 L / 27.5 cu-ft
300 L / 10.6 cu-ft
196 L / 6.9 cu-ft ~ 780 L / 27.5 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
3.6 L / 3.8 qt
3.6 L / 3.8 qt
Fuel Capacity
35.0 L / 9.2 gal
35.0 L / 9.2 gal
Passengers
4
5
4

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Disc
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent, Elastic beam
Semi-independent, coil spring
Turning Circle
9.6 m / 31.5 ft
9.6 m / 31.5 ft

Construction

Body Style
3-door Hatchback
5-door Hatchback
3-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
120 mm / 4.7 in
120 mm / 4.7 in
Size | Height
1460 mm / 57.5 in
1474 mm / 58.0 in
1460 mm / 57.5 in
Size | Length
3996 mm / 157.3 in
Size | Width
1615 mm / 63.6 in | 1884 mm / 74.2 in (mirror unfolded)
1749 mm / 68.9 in | 2007 mm / 79.0 in (mirror unfolded) | 1829 mm / 72.0 in (mirror folded)
1615 mm / 63.6 in | 1884 mm / 74.2 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1425.0 mm / 56.1 in
1471.0 mm / 57.9 in
1425.0 mm / 56.1 in
Track Width | Rear
1420.0 mm / 55.9 in
1471.0 mm / 57.9 in
1420.0 mm / 55.9 in
Wheel Size
15 in, 16 in, 17 in
Wheelbase
2340 mm / 92.1 in
2539 mm / 100.0 in
2340 mm / 92.1 in

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d-ISC
Engine | Bore
75.0 mm / 3.0 in
Transmission | Gears
5-speed
5-speed

Production

Availability
2020

Reviews

Neofiliac score
12%
8%
12%
Pros
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
Cons
  • Horrible performance
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Poor suspension setup
  • Horrible performance
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Low cargo capacity
  • Horrible performance
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Poor suspension setup

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.