Compare Citroen C1 II 3-door vs Citroen C3 III facelift vs Citroen C4 Coupe
Variants
1.0 69
1.0 69 AT
1.2 82
1.0 72
1.0 72 Euro6d
1.2 110
1.2 110 AT
1.2 83
1.5 HDi 102
1.4 88
1.6 HDi 109
1.6 HDi 90
1.6 THP
1.6 VTi
1.6 VTi AT
1.6
1.6 AT
2.0 HDi 136
2.0 HDi 136 AT
2.0 HDi 140
2.0
VTS 2.0
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
196 L / 6.9 cu-ft ~ 780 L / 27.5 cu-ft
300 L / 10.6 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
3.6 L / 3.8 qt
Fuel Capacity
35.0 L / 9.2 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
4
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Disc
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent, Elastic beam
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Turning Circle
9.6 m / 31.5 ft
Construction
Body Style
3-door Hatchback
5-door Hatchback
3-door Coupe
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
120 mm / 4.7 in
Size | Height
1460 mm / 57.5 in
1474 mm / 58.0 in
1456 mm / 57.3 in
Size | Length
3996 mm / 157.3 in
Size | Width
1615 mm / 63.6 in | 1884 mm / 74.2 in (mirror unfolded)
1749 mm / 68.9 in | 2007 mm / 79.0 in (mirror unfolded) | 1829 mm / 72.0 in (mirror folded)
1769 mm / 69.6 in | 1964 mm / 77.3 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1425.0 mm / 56.1 in
1471.0 mm / 57.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1420.0 mm / 55.9 in
1471.0 mm / 57.9 in
1502.0 mm / 59.1 in
Wheel Size
15 in, 16 in, 17 in
Wheelbase
2340 mm / 92.1 in
2539 mm / 100.0 in
2608 mm / 102.7 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.28
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d-ISC
Engine | Bore
75.0 mm / 3.0 in
Transmission | Gears
5-speed
Production
Availability
2020
Reviews
Neofiliac score
12%
8%
13%
Pros
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Low fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
- Low fuel consumption
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
Cons
- Horrible performance
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with tiny engines
- Poor suspension setup
- Horrible performance
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with tiny engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Low cargo capacity
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.