Compare Citroen AMI vs Citroen C3 II vs Citroen C3 III facelift

Variants
1.0 68
1.1 60
1.2 110
1.2 82
1.2 82 AT
1.4 95
1.4 95 AT
1.4 95 AT
1.4 e-HDi 68 AT
1.4 HDi 68
1.4 HDi 68 2013+
1.4i 73
1.6 120
1.6 120 2013+
1.6 120 AT
1.6 120 AT 2013+
1.6 BlueHDi 75
1.6 BlueHDI 99
1.6 e-HDI 114 AT
1.6 e-HDi 92
1.6 e-HDI 92 2013+
1.6 e-HDi 92 AT
1.6 e-HDI 92 AT 2013+
1.6 HDi 112
1.6 HDi 90
1.6 HDi 92
1.2 110
1.2 110 AT
1.2 83
1.5 HDi 102

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
300 L / 10.6 cu-ft
Passengers
2
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
MacPherson strut
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent, Elastic beam
Turning Circle
7.2 m / 23.6 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
5.5 kWh (gross)
Body Style
2-door battery-electric Hatchback
5-door Hatchback
5-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Size | Height
1520 mm / 59.8 in
1474 mm / 58.0 in
Size | Length
2410 mm / 94.9 in
3941 mm / 155.2 in
3996 mm / 157.3 in
Size | Width
1390 mm / 54.7 in
1749 mm / 68.9 in | 2007 mm / 79.0 in (mirror unfolded) | 1829 mm / 72.0 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1471.0 mm / 57.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1471.0 mm / 57.9 in
Weight
485.0 kg / 1069.2 lbs
Wheel Size
14 in
15 in, 16 in, 17 in
Wheelbase
2466 mm / 97.1 in
2539 mm / 100.0 in

Performance

Top Speed
45.0 km/h / 28.0 mph

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d-ISC
Engine | Bore
75.0 mm / 3.0 in
Engine | Power
8 hp / 6.0 kW

Production

Availability
2020
2020

Reviews

Neofiliac score
17%
13%
8%
Pros
  • Very small turning circle
  • Cute styling
  • Good 0.29 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Low fuel consumption
Cons
  • More like a toy
  • Slower than a golf cart
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Bug ugly
  • Horrible performance
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Low cargo capacity

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.