HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Renault Twizy vs Renault Megane III vs Renault Twingo II

Variants
1.2 TCe 115
1.2 TCe 132
1.2 TCe 132 AT
1.4 TCe 130
1.5 dCi 110
1.5 dCi 110 AT
1.5 dCi 90
1.5 dCi 95
1.6 100
1.6 dCi 130
1.9 dCi 131
2.0 140 CVT
GT 2.0 dCi 160
GT 2.0 dCi 165
GT 2.0 TCe 180
GT 2.0 TCe 220
1.2 58
1.2 76
1.2 GT 100
1.2 75 Euro5
1.5 dCi 64
RS 1.6 133

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
31 L / 1.1 cu-ft
405 L / 14.3 cu-ft ~ 1162 L / 41.0 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
40.0 L / 10.6 gal
Passengers
2
5
4
Payload
216 kg / 476 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 214 mm
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs, 204 mm
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
MacPherson, Transverse stabilizer
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Tire Size
Front wheel tires: 125/80 R13 Rear wheel tires: 145/80 R13
Turning Circle
6.8 m / 22.3 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
6.1 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Body Style
2-door battery-electric Hatchback
5-door Hatchback
3-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
120 mm / 4.7 in
120 mm / 4.7 in
120 mm / 4.7 in
Size | Height
1454 mm / 57.2 in
Size | Length
2338 mm / 92.0 in
4295 mm / 169.1 in
Size | Width
1237 mm / 48.7 in | 1381 mm / 54.4 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1094.0 mm / 43.1 in
1546.0 mm / 60.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1080.0 mm / 42.5 in
1547.0 mm / 60.9 in
Weight
474.0 kg / 1045.0 lbs
Wheelbase
1686 mm / 66.4 in
2641 mm / 104.0 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.64
Top Speed
80.0 km/h / 49.7 mph, 80.0 km/h / 49.7 mph (EV mode)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Rear-engine (transverse), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Power
17 hp / 12.7 kW
Transmission | Gears
1-speed
5-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Manual

Production

Availability
2012

Reviews

Neofiliac score
28%
20%
14%
Pros
  • Very small turning circle
  • Fun looks
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Decent engine reliability
  • Small turning circle
  • Stylish design
Cons
  • Not a real car
  • Horrid 0.64 drag coefficient
  • Poor suspension setup
  • Very little cargo space
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Questionable CVT and auto gearboxes
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.