HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Renault Twizy vs Renault Megane II vs Renault Clio V

Variants
1.4 82
1.4 98
1.5 dCi 101
1.5 dCi 101 AT
1.5 dCi 103
1.5 dCi 106
1.5 dCi 82
1.5 dCi 86
1.6 112
1.6 112 AT
1.6 113
1.6 113 AT
1.9 dCi 120
1.9 dCi 90
2.0 135
2.0 135 AT
2.0 Turbo 163
GT 1.9 dCi 110
GT 1.9 dCi 130
GT 1.9 dCi 130 AT
GT 2.0 dCi 150
RS 2.0 dCi 173
RS 2.0 Turbo 224
1.0 SCe 65
1.0 SCe 75
1.0 TCe 100
1.0 TCe 100 CVT
1.3 TCe 130 EDC
1.5 dCi 115
1.5 dCi 85
1.6 E-Tech

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
31 L / 1.1 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
2
5
5
Payload
216 kg / 476 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 214 mm
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs, 204 mm
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
MacPherson, Transverse stabilizer
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent
Tire Size
Front wheel tires: 125/80 R13 Rear wheel tires: 145/80 R13
Turning Circle
6.8 m / 22.3 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
6.1 kWh (gross)
1.2 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Body Style
2-door battery-electric Hatchback
5-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
120 mm / 4.7 in
120 mm / 4.7 in
Size | Height
1454 mm / 57.2 in
1440 mm / 56.7 in
Size | Length
2338 mm / 92.0 in
4050 mm / 159.4 in
Size | Width
1237 mm / 48.7 in | 1381 mm / 54.4 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1094.0 mm / 43.1 in
Track Width | Rear
1080.0 mm / 42.5 in
Weight
474.0 kg / 1045.0 lbs
Wheelbase
1686 mm / 66.4 in
2583 mm / 101.7 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.64
Top Speed
80.0 km/h / 49.7 mph, 80.0 km/h / 49.7 mph (EV mode)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Rear-engine (transverse), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Power
17 hp / 12.7 kW
Transmission | Gears
1-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic

Production

Availability
2012

Reviews

Neofiliac score
28%
16%
19%
Pros
  • Very small turning circle
  • Fun looks
  • Interesting engine options
  • Decent drivetrain reliability
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
Cons
  • Not a real car
  • Horrid 0.64 drag coefficient
  • Poor suspension setup
  • Very little cargo space
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Poor performance
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • Poor suspension setup

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.