HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Renault Zoe facelift vs Renault Twizy vs Renault Twingo II

Variants
R110 41kWh
R110 52kWh
R135 52kWh
1.2 58
1.2 76
1.2 GT 100
1.2 75 Euro5
1.5 dCi 64
RS 1.6 133

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
31 L / 1.1 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
40.0 L / 10.6 gal
Passengers
5
2
4
Payload
216 kg / 476 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 214 mm
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs, 204 mm
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent
MacPherson, Transverse stabilizer
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Tire Size
Front wheel tires: 125/80 R13 Rear wheel tires: 145/80 R13
Turning Circle
10.6 m / 34.6 ft
6.8 m / 22.3 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
6.1 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Lithium-ion
Body Style
5-door battery-electric Hatchback
2-door battery-electric Hatchback
3-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
120 mm / 4.7 in
120 mm / 4.7 in
120 mm / 4.7 in
Size | Height
1562 mm / 61.5 in
1454 mm / 57.2 in
Size | Length
2338 mm / 92.0 in
Size | Width
1237 mm / 48.7 in | 1381 mm / 54.4 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1506.0 mm / 59.3 in
1094.0 mm / 43.1 in
Track Width | Rear
1489.0 mm / 58.6 in
1080.0 mm / 42.5 in
Weight
1502.0 kg / 3311.3 lbs
474.0 kg / 1045.0 lbs
Wheelbase
2588 mm / 101.9 in
1686 mm / 66.4 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.64
Top Speed
80.0 km/h / 49.7 mph, 80.0 km/h / 49.7 mph (EV mode)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Rear-engine (transverse), Rear-wheel drive
Engine | Power
17 hp / 12.7 kW
Transmission | Gears
1-speed
1-speed
5-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Automatic
Manual

Production

Availability
2019
2012

Reviews

Neofiliac score
8%
28%
14%
Pros
  • Less ugly than the Nissan Leaf
  • Very small turning circle
  • Fun looks
  • Small turning circle
  • Stylish design
Cons
  • Horrible performance
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Disastrous build quality
  • Poor suspension setup
  • Not a real car
  • Horrid 0.64 drag coefficient
  • Poor suspension setup
  • Very little cargo space
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.