Compare Renault Twingo III facelift vs Renault Twizy vs Renault Twingo II
Variants
0.9 TCe
0.9 TCe EDC
1.0 SCe 65
1.0 SCe 73
Z.E.
1.2 58
1.2 76
1.2 GT 100
1.2 75 Euro5
1.5 dCi 64
RS 1.6 133
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
174 L / 6.1 cu-ft ~ 980 L / 34.6 cu-ft
31 L / 1.1 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
35.0 L / 9.2 gal
40.0 L / 10.6 gal
Passengers
2
4
Payload
216 kg / 476 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 214 mm
Brakes | Rear
Drum
Ventilated discs, 204 mm
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent
MacPherson, Transverse stabilizer
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Tire Size
Front wheel tires: 125/80 R13 Rear wheel tires: 145/80 R13
Turning Circle
8.8 m / 28.7 ft
6.8 m / 22.3 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
6.1 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Body Style
2-door battery-electric Hatchback
3-door Hatchback
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
120 mm / 4.7 in
120 mm / 4.7 in
Size | Height
1454 mm / 57.2 in
Size | Length
2338 mm / 92.0 in
Size | Width
1646 mm / 64.8 in
1237 mm / 48.7 in | 1381 mm / 54.4 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1452.0 mm / 57.2 in
1094.0 mm / 43.1 in
Track Width | Rear
1425.0 mm / 56.1 in
1080.0 mm / 42.5 in
Weight
474.0 kg / 1045.0 lbs
Wheelbase
2492 mm / 98.1 in
1686 mm / 66.4 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.64
Top Speed
80.0 km/h / 49.7 mph, 80.0 km/h / 49.7 mph (EV mode)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Rear-engine (transverse), Rear-wheel drive
Rear-engine (transverse), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d-TEMP
Engine | Power
17 hp / 12.7 kW
Transmission | Gears
1-speed
5-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Manual
Production
Availability
2012
Reviews
Neofiliac score
3%
28%
14%
Pros
- Very small turning circle
- Very small turning circle
- Fun looks
- Small turning circle
- Stylish design
Cons
- Horrible performance
- Miserably low engine output
- Miserable electric range
- Only available with tiny engines
- Poor suspension setup
- The bus is much better
- Not a real car
- Horrid 0.64 drag coefficient
- Poor suspension setup
- Very little cargo space
- Bad 0-100kph time
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with tiny engines
- No independent rear suspensions
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.