Compare Renault Twingo III facelift vs Chevrolet Spark EV vs Renault Zoe

Variants
0.9 TCe
0.9 TCe EDC
1.0 SCe 65
1.0 SCe 73
Z.E.
Q210
Q90
R110
R240
R75
R90 22kWh
R90 41kWh

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
174 L / 6.1 cu-ft ~ 980 L / 34.6 cu-ft
272 L / 9.6 cu-ft ~ 663 L / 23.4 cu-ft
338 L / 11.9 cu-ft ~ 1225 L / 43.3 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
35.0 L / 9.2 gal
Passengers
4
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Drum
Disc
Drum
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent
Semi-independent
Semi-independent, coil spring
Tire Size
185/55 R15, 195/55 R15
Turning Circle
8.8 m / 28.7 ft
10.3 m / 33.8 ft
10.5 m / 34.4 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
21.0 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door battery-electric Hatchback
5-door battery-electric Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
120 mm / 4.7 in
Size | Height
1590 mm / 62.6 in
1562 mm / 61.5 in
Size | Length
3721 mm / 146.5 in
4084 mm / 160.8 in
Size | Width
1646 mm / 64.8 in
1626 mm / 64.0 in
1730 mm / 68.1 in | 1945 mm / 76.6 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1452.0 mm / 57.2 in
1410.0 mm / 55.5 in
1511.0 mm / 59.5 in
Track Width | Rear
1425.0 mm / 56.1 in
1392.0 mm / 54.8 in
Weight
1300.0 kg / 2866.0 lbs
Wheel Size
15 in
Wheelbase
2492 mm / 98.1 in
2375 mm / 93.5 in
2588 mm / 101.9 in

Performance

Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
7.6 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
7.2 sec
Top Speed
145.0 km/h / 90.1 mph
135.0 km/h / 83.9 mph

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Rear-engine (transverse), Rear-wheel drive
Front-wheel drive
Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d-TEMP
Engine | Power
143 hp / 106.6 kW
Transmission | Gears
1-speed
1-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic

Production

Availability
2013 ~ 2016

Reviews

Neofiliac score
3%
6%
18%
Pros
  • Very small turning circle
  • Small turning circle
  • Cute EV
  • Stylish design
  • Easy to drive and park in big cities
Cons
  • Horrible performance
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Miserable electric range
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Poor suspension setup
  • The bus is much better
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Horrible range
  • Poor battery degradation
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Short electric range
  • Air-cooled battery

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.