HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Opel Adam vs Chevrolet Cruze Hatchback vs Opel Astra H

Variants
1.0 115
1.0 90
1.2 70
1.2 70 Euro6d
1.4 100
1.4 100 Euro6d
1.4 87 Euro6d
1.4 87
1.4 87 AT
1.4 100
1.4 87
1.4 87 AT
S 1.4 Turbo Euro6d
S 1.4 Turbo
1.4
1.4 Turbo
1.4 Turbo AT
1.6
1.7 TD 110
1.7 TD 130
1.8 AT
1.8
2.0 TD AT
2.0 TD
1.3 CDTI
1.3 CDTI AT
1.4
1.4 AT
1.6 105
1.6 105 AT
1.6 115
1.7 CDTI 100
1.7 CDTI 110
1.7 CDTI 125
1.7 CDTI 80
1.8 125
1.8 125 AT
1.8 140
1.8 140 AT
1.9 CDTI 120
1.9 CDTI 120 AT
1.9 CDTI 150
2.0 Turbo 170
2.0 Turbo 200
2.0 Turbo 240

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
413 L / 14.6 cu-ft ~ 883 L / 31.2 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
4.0 L / 4.2 qt
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
52.0 L / 13.7 gal
Passengers
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Disc
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent
Semi-independent, Torsion
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Turning Circle
10.9 m / 35.8 ft
11.2 m / 36.7 ft

Construction

Body Style
3-door Hatchback
5-door Hatchback
5-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
160 mm / 6.3 in
Size | Height
1477 mm / 58.1 in
1467 mm / 57.8 in
Size | Length
4249 mm / 167.3 in
Size | Width
1720 mm / 67.7 in | 1966 mm / 77.4 in (mirror unfolded)
1753 mm / 69.0 in | 2033 mm / 80.0 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1472.0 mm / 58.0 in
1544.0 mm / 60.8 in
1488.0 mm / 58.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1464.0 mm / 57.6 in
1558.0 mm / 61.3 in
1488.0 mm / 58.6 in
Wheelbase
2311 mm / 91.0 in
2685 mm / 105.7 in
2614 mm / 102.9 in

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5

Reviews

Neofiliac score
28%
19%
17%
Pros
  • Great styling
  • Small turning circle
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Decent engine reliability
  • Rather good automatic transmissions
  • Decent engine options
  • Decent exterior styling
Cons
  • Bad performance
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Basic interior
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Somewhat ugly
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Poor automatic transmissions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.