Compare Mercedes A-Class W177 vs SEAT Ibiza 4 vs Mercedes CLC CL203

Variants
A 160
A 180
A 180 d DCT
A 200
A 200 4MATIC DCT
A 200 d 4MATIC DCT
A 200 d DCT
A 200 DCT
A 220 4MATIC DCT
A 220 d 4MATIC DCT
A 220 d DCT
A 220 DCT
A 250 4MATIC DCT
A 250 DCT
A 250e
A 35 AMG
A 45 AMG
A 45 S AMG
1.0
1.0 TSI 110
1.0 TSI 110 DSG
1.0 TSI 95
1.2 60
1.2 70
1.2 TDI
1.2 TSI 105
1.2 TSI 105 DSG
1.2 TSI 85
1.2 TSI 90
1.4 85
1.4 85 2012+
1.4 TDI 105
1.4 TDI 75
1.4 TDI 80
1.4 TDI 90
1.4 TDI 90 DSG
1.4 TSI 140
1.4 TSI 150
1.4 TSI 150 DSG
1.6
1.6 DSG
1.6 LPG
1.6 TDI 105
1.6 TDI 90
1.6 TDI 90 DSG
1.9 TDI 105
1.9 TDI 90
2.0 TDI
CLC 160
CLC 160 AT
CLC 180 Kompressor
CLC 180 Kompressor AT
CLC 200 CDI
CLC 200 CDI AT
CLC 200 Kompressor
CLC 200 Kompressor AT
CLC 220 CDI
CLC 220 CDI AT
CLC 230
CLC 230 AT
CLC 250
CLC 250 AT
CLC 350
CLC 350 AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
310 L / 10.9 cu-ft ~ 1100 L / 38.8 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
62.0 L / 16.4 gal
Passengers
5
5
4

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Multi-link

Construction

Battery | Capacity
15.6 kWh (gross)
Body Style
3-door Coupe

Dimensions

Size | Height
1405 mm / 55.3 in
Size | Width
1693 mm / 66.7 in
Track Width | Front
1505.0 mm / 59.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1476.0 mm / 58.1 in
Wheelbase
2729 mm / 107.4 in
2469 mm / 97.2 in
2715 mm / 106.9 in

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive

Reviews

Neofiliac score
48%
16%
31%
Pros
  • Rather good design for a hatchback
  • Good performance in some models
  • Good 0.25 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Decent build quality
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • RWD remained
  • Slight interior improvements
Cons
  • Only available with small engines
  • Basic suspension setup
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small, unreliable engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Arguably less appealing than its predecessor
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Cheaply put together

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.