Compare Mercedes-Benz A-Class W177 vs Mercedes-Benz A-Class W169 vs Alfa Romeo MiTo (955) facelift 2

Mercedes-Benz A-Class W177

Mercedes-Benz A-Class W169

Alfa Romeo MiTo (955) facelift 2

Mercedes-Benz A-Class W177Mercedes-Benz A-Class W169Alfa Romeo MiTo (955) facelift 2
Variants
A 160
A 180
A 180 d DCT
A 200
A 200 4MATIC DCT
A 200 d 4MATIC DCT
A 200 d DCT
A 200 DCT
A 220 4MATIC DCT
A 220 d 4MATIC DCT
A 220 d DCT
A 220 DCT
A 250 4MATIC DCT
A 250 DCT
A 250e
A 35 AMG
A 45 AMG
A 45 S AMG
A 150
A 150 CVT
A 160 CDI
A 160 CDI CVT
A 170
A 170 CVT
A 180 CDI
A 180 CDI CVT
A 200
A 200 CDI
A 200 CDI CVT
A 200 CVT
A 200 Turbo
A 200 Turbo CVT
0.9 TwinAir 105
1.3 JTD 95
1.4
1.4 TB MultiAir 140 TCT
1.4 TB MultiAir 170 TCT

Reviews

Neofiliac score48%1%23%
Pros
  • Rather good design for a hatchback
  • Good performance in some models
  • Good 0.25 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Decent build quality
  • Three-pointed star
  • Low official fuel consumption
Cons
  • Only available with small engines
  • Basic suspension setup
  • Poor engine options
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • CVT
  • Exceptionally ugly
  • Great insult to the Mercedes name
  • No powerful engine options
  • Tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.