Compare SEAT Leon 4 vs Mercedes C-Class SportCoupe vs Mercedes B-Class W247
Variants
1.0 eTSI DSG
1.0 TSI 110
1.0 TSI 90
1.4 e-HYBRID DSG
1.5 eTSI DSG
1.5 TGI
1.5 TGI DSG
1.5 TSI 130
1.5 TSI 150
2.0 TDI 115
2.0 TDI 150 DSG
2.0 TSI DSG
C 30 CDI AMG AT
C 32 AMG AT
C 160
C 160 AT
C 180
C 180 AT
C 180 Kompressor
C 180 Kompressor AT
C 200 CDI
C 200 CDI AT
C 200 CGI
C 200 Kompressor Euro4
C 200 Kompressor
C 200 Kompressor Euro4 AT
C 200 Kompressor AT
C 220 CDI
C 220 CDI AT
C 220 CDI Euro4
C 220 CDI Euro4 AT
C 230
C 230 AT
C 230 Kompressor Euro4
C 230 Kompressor Euro4 AT
C 230 Kompressor
C 230 Kompressor AT
C 320
C 320 AT
C 350
C 350 AT
B 160
B 180
B 180 DCT
B 180d
B 180d DCT
B 200
B 200 4MATIC DCT
B 200 DCT
B 200d DCT
B 220 4MATIC DCT
B 220 DCT
B 220d 4MATIC DCT
B 220d DCT
B 250 4MATIC DCT
B 250 DCT
B 250e DCT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
310 L / 10.9 cu-ft ~ 1100 L / 38.8 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
62.0 L / 16.4 gal
Passengers
5
4
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
13.4 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
9.4 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
17.2 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Multi-link
Turning Circle
10.5 m / 34.4 ft
10.8 m / 35.3 ft
11.0 m / 36.1 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
12.8 kWh (gross)
15.6 kWh (gross)
Body Style
3-door Coupe
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
104 mm / 4.1 in
Size | Height
1562 mm / 61.5 in
Size | Length
4368 mm / 172.0 in
4343 mm / 171.0 in
4419 mm / 174.0 in
Track Width | Front
1567.0 mm / 61.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1516.0 mm / 59.7 in
1547.0 mm / 60.9 in
Wheelbase
2715 mm / 106.9 in
2729 mm / 107.4 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.29
Electric Range
58.0 km / 36.0 mi
70.0 km / 43.5 mi
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.6:1
Transmission | Gears
6 / 7 / 8-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual / automatic / DCT
Production
Debut
2018 Paris Auto Show
Reviews
Neofiliac score
17%
34%
27%
Pros
- Low official fuel consumption
- Less ugly than before
- RWD-based
- Fully independent suspensions
- Excellent 0.24 drag coefficient
- Low fuel consumption
- Better-looking than before
Cons
- Poorly built
- Only available with small engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Horrible AMGs
- No powerful engine options
- Basic suspension setup for FWD vehicles
- Utilitarian
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.