HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare SEAT Leon 4 vs Fiat 500 vs Fiat 500 facelift

Variants
1.0 eTSI DSG
1.0 TSI 110
1.0 TSI 90
1.4 e-HYBRID DSG
1.5 eTSI DSG
1.5 TGI
1.5 TGI DSG
1.5 TSI 130
1.5 TSI 150
2.0 TDI 115
2.0 TDI 150 DSG
2.0 TSI DSG
0.9 TWIN AIR
1.2
1.3 Multijet
1.4
0.9 TwinAir 105
0.9 TwinAir 85
0.9 TwinAir 85 Euro6d
0.9 TwinAir 85 AT
0.9 TwinAir 85 Euro6d AT
1.0 70
1.2 69
1.2 69 Euro6d
1.2 69 AT
1.2 69 Euro6d AT
1.3 MultiJet 95
1.4 MultiAir 135
1.4 MultiAir 135 AT

Capacity

Fuel Capacity
35.0 L / 9.2 gal
Passengers
5
4
4
Payload
440 kg / 970 lbs

Chassis

Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent
Turning Circle
10.5 m / 34.4 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
12.8 kWh (gross)
Body Style
3-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
114 mm / 4.5 in
Size | Height
1488 mm / 58.6 in
Size | Length
4368 mm / 172.0 in
3546 mm / 139.6 in
Size | Width
1627 mm / 64.1 in
Track Width | Rear
1516.0 mm / 59.7 in
1408.0 mm / 55.4 in
Wheelbase
2300 mm / 90.6 in
2300 mm / 90.6 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.362
Electric Range
58.0 km / 36.0 mi

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
80.5 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.0:1
Engine | Redline
6500 rpm
Engine | Stroke
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Transmission | Type
Manual

Reviews

Neofiliac score
17%
20%
25%
Pros
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Less ugly than before
  • Excellent exterior styling
  • Small turning circle
  • Great styling
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
Cons
  • Poorly built
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Horrible performance
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • High 0.36 drag coefficient
  • Poor suspension setup

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.