Compare SEAT Leon 4 vs Toyota Prius 4 facelift vs Toyota Matrix E130
Variants
1.0 eTSI DSG
1.0 TSI 110
1.0 TSI 90
1.4 e-HYBRID DSG
1.5 eTSI DSG
1.5 TGI
1.5 TGI DSG
1.5 TSI 130
1.5 TSI 150
2.0 TDI 115
2.0 TDI 150 DSG
2.0 TSI DSG
FWD
AWD
1.8 124PS AWD
1.8 124PS AWD AT
1.8 132PS
1.8 132PS AT
1.8 183PS
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
501 L / 17.7 cu-ft ~ 1633 L / 57.7 cu-ft
617 L / 21.8 cu-ft ~ 1507 L / 53.2 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
5.4 L / 5.7 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.2 L / 4.4 qt
Fuel Capacity
43.0 L / 11.4 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Double-wishbone
Tire Size
205/55 R16
Turning Circle
10.5 m / 34.4 ft
10.2 m / 33.5 ft
9.8 m / 32.1 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
12.8 kWh (gross)
1.3 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door hybrid Hatchback
5-door Station Wagon
Dimensions
Size | Height
1540 mm / 60.6 in
Size | Length
4368 mm / 172.0 in
4575 mm / 180.1 in
4350 mm / 171.3 in
Size | Width
1760 mm / 69.3 in
1775 mm / 69.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1516.0 mm / 59.7 in
Wheel Size
16 in
Wheelbase
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2600 mm / 102.4 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.24
Electric Range
58.0 km / 36.0 mi
Towing Capacity
725 kg / 1598 lbs (w/o brakes) | 725 kg / 1598 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6 AG
Engine
2ZR-FXE
Engine | Bore
80.5 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
13.0:1
Engine | Displacement
1.8 L / 109.7 cu-in / 1798.0 cc
Engine | Specific Output
53.9 hp/L / 0.9 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
88.3 mm / 3.5 in
Engine | Torque
142 Nm / 104.7 lb-ft @ 3600 rpm + 163 Nm / 120.2 lb-ft
Engine | Type
multi-port injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Type
e-CVT
Production
Availability
2018
2002 ~ 2007
Reviews
Neofiliac score
17%
55%
16%
Pros
- Low official fuel consumption
- Less ugly than before
- Excellent 0.24 drag coefficient
- Small turning circle
- Super reliability
- Low fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
- Reliable engines
Cons
- Poorly built
- Only available with small engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Poor performance
- Miserably low engine output
- No powerful engine options
- Boring design
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.