HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare SEAT Leon 4 vs Toyota Matrix 2 vs Toyota Auris

Variants
1.0 eTSI DSG
1.0 TSI 110
1.0 TSI 90
1.4 e-HYBRID DSG
1.5 eTSI DSG
1.5 TGI
1.5 TGI DSG
1.5 TSI 130
1.5 TSI 150
2.0 TDI 115
2.0 TDI 150 DSG
2.0 TSI DSG
Automatic
AWD Automatic
Manual
1.3
1.33
1.4 D-4D 90
1.4 D-4D Euro5
1.4
1.6 132 Euro5
1.6 132
1.6 124 AT
1.6 124
1.8
1.8 Euro5
Hybrid
2.0 D-4D 126 Euro5
2.0 D-4D 126
2.0 D-4D 90
2.2 D-4D
2.2 D-CAT Euro5

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
560 L / 19.8 cu-ft ~ 1398 L / 49.4 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Disc, 295 mm
Brakes | Rear
Disc, 277 mm
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Tire Size
205/55 R16 89H
Turning Circle
10.5 m / 34.4 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
12.8 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
135 mm / 5.3 in
Size | Length
4368 mm / 172.0 in
4394 mm / 173.0 in
Size | Width
1765 mm / 69.5 in
1760 mm / 69.3 in
Track Width | Front
1519.0 mm / 59.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1516.0 mm / 59.7 in
1521.0 mm / 59.9 in
Wheel Size
16 in
Wheelbase
2601 mm / 102.4 in
2600 mm / 102.4 in

Performance

Electric Range
58.0 km / 36.0 mi
1.5 km / 0.9 mi

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine
2AZ-FE I4
Engine | Bore
88.5 mm / 3.5 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.6:1
Engine | Displacement
2.4 L / 144.1 cu-in / 2362.0 cc
Engine | Power
160.0 hp / 119.3 kW @ 5600 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
67.7 hp/L / 1.1 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
96.0 mm / 3.8 in
Engine | Torque
225 Nm / 166.0 lb-ft @ 4000 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder

Production

Availability
2008 ~ 2014

Reviews

Neofiliac score
17%
24%
33%
Pros
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Less ugly than before
  • Decent exterior design
  • Good drivetrain reliability
  • Rather good exterior design
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
Cons
  • Poorly built
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • No powerful engine options
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • V6 only available in Japan

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.