HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Renault Kadjar vs Kia Soul vs Renault Captur

Variants
1.2 TCe 130
1.5 dCi 110
1.5 dCi 110 AT
1.6 dCi 130
1.6 dCi 130 AWD
1.6
1.6 CRDi
1.6 CRDi AT
TCe 90
TCe 120 AT
TCe 120
TCe 120 AT Stop&Start
TCe 130
dCi 110
dCi 110 Euro6b
dCi 90 AT
dCi 90 Euro6b
dCi 90 Euro6b AT
dCi 90
TCe 150
TCe 150 AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
409 L / 14.4 cu-ft ~ 1478 L / 52.2 cu-ft
370 L / 13.1 cu-ft ~ 570 L / 20.1 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
48.0 L / 12.7 gal
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
410 kg / 904 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
18.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
28.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, Elastic beam
Tire Size
195/65R15
Turning Circle
10.7 m / 35.2 ft
10.5 m / 34.4 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Crossover
5-door Crossover
5-door Crossover

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
200 mm / 7.9 in
170 mm / 6.7 in
Size | Height
1607 mm / 63.3 in
1661 mm / 65.4 in
Size | Length
4449 mm / 175.2 in
4105 mm / 161.6 in
4122 mm / 162.3 in
Size | Width
1836 mm / 72.3 in | 2058 mm / 81.0 in (mirror unfolded)
1785 mm / 70.3 in
Track Width | Front
1556.0 mm / 61.3 in
1570.0 mm / 61.8 in
1531.0 mm / 60.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1542.0 mm / 60.7 in
1575.0 mm / 62.0 in
1516.0 mm / 59.7 in
Weight
1270.0 kg / 2799.9 lbs
Wheel Size
16 in, 17 in, 19 in
Wheelbase
2646 mm / 104.2 in
2550 mm / 100.4 in
2606 mm / 102.6 in

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Euro 4
Engine | Bore
76.0 mm / 3.0 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
16.0:1
Engine | Displacement
1.6 L / 97.1 cu-in / 1591.0 cc
Engine | Specific Output
79.2 hp/L / 1.3 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
80.5 mm / 3.2 in
Transmission | Gears
6-speed

Production

Availability
2015
2009 ~ 2014

Reviews

Neofiliac score
4%
14%
1%
Pros
  • Basic offroad capabilities
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Distinct styling
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
Cons
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • CMiserably low engine output
  • Poor build quality
  • Horrible styling
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Both ugly and forgettable

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.