Compare Chevrolet Traverse 2 vs Chevrolet Traverse vs Chevrolet Captiva
Variants
2.0
3.6
3.6 AWD
281 AWD
281 FWD
288 AWD
288 FWD
2.0 VCDi 127
2.0 VCDi 127 AWD
2.0 VCDi 150
2.0 VCDi 150 AWD
2.0 VCDi 150 AWD AT
2.2 VCDi 163
2.2 VCDi 163 AT
2.2 VCDi 163 AWD
2.2 VCDi 184 AT
2.2 VCDi 184 AWD
2.2 VCDi 184 AWD AT
2.4
2.4 AWD
2.4 AWD AT
2.4 Ecotec 167
2.4 Ecotec 167 AT
2.4 Ecotec 167 AWD
2.4 Ecotec 167 AWD AT
3.0 AWD AT
3.2 AWD AT
Sport 2.4 AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
651 L / 23.0 cu-ft ~ 2781 L / 98.2 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
11.2 L / 11.8 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
5.2 L / 5.5 qt
Fuel Capacity
83.3 L / 22.0 gal
Passengers
5 / 7
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs, 325 mm
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs, 331 mm
Offroad | Approach Angle
18.2 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
22.7 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
225/65 R18, 255/55 R20
245/70 R17, 255/65 R18, 255/55 R20
Turning Circle
11.9 m / 39.0 ft
12.3 m / 40.3 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door Crossover
5-door Crossover
5-door SUV
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
183 mm / 7.2 in
Size | Height
1795 mm / 70.7 in
Size | Length
5189 mm / 204.3 in
Size | Width
1996 mm / 78.6 in
Track Width | Front
1709.0 mm / 67.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1702.0 mm / 67.0 in
Weight
1978.0 kg / 4360.7 lbs
Wheel Size
18 in, 20 in
7J x 17, 7.5J x 18, 8J x 20
Wheelbase
3071 mm / 120.9 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.38
Towing Capacity
2268 kg / 5000 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
2358 kg / 5199 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Engine | Bore
94.0 mm / 3.7 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.5:1
Engine | Displacement
3.6 L / 217.5 cu-in / 3564.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
85.6 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated direct-injected petrol V6 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
9-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic Hydra-Matic
Automatic Hydra-Matic 6T75
Production
Availability
2009 ~ 2017
Reviews
Neofiliac score
40%
21%
45%
Pros
- Good exterior styling
- High cargo capacity
- Lots of space inside
- High cargo capacity
- Rather reliable powertrain
- Reasonable drivetrain reliability
- Good towing capacity
Cons
- Average handling
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Very bland, unfinished styling
- Very ugly
- Bad 0-100kph time
- High 0.38 drag coefficient
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.