Compare Chevrolet Blazer vs Chevrolet Captiva / Holden Captiva vs Volvo V40 Cross Country

Chevrolet Blazer

Chevrolet Captiva / Holden Captiva

Volvo V40 Cross Country

Chevrolet BlazerChevrolet Captiva / Holden CaptivaVolvo V40 Cross Country
Variants
2.0T
2.5
3.6
3.6 AWD
2.0 VCDi 127
2.0 VCDi 127 AWD
2.0 VCDi 150
2.0 VCDi 150 AWD
2.0 VCDi 150 AWD AT
2.2 VCDi 163
2.2 VCDi 163 AT
2.2 VCDi 163 AWD
2.2 VCDi 184 AT
2.2 VCDi 184 AWD
2.2 VCDi 184 AWD AT
2.4
2.4 AWD
2.4 AWD AT
2.4 Ecotec 167
2.4 Ecotec 167 AT
2.4 Ecotec 167 AWD
2.4 Ecotec 167 AWD AT
3.0 AWD AT
3.2 AWD AT
Sport 2.4 AT
D2 115PS
D2 115PS AT
D2 120PS
D2 120PS AT
D3 150PS
D3 150PS AT
D4 177PS
D4 177PS AT
D4 190PS
D4 190PS AT
T3 152PS
T3 AT
T4
T4 180PS AT
T4 180PS AWD AT
T4 AT
T5 213PS AT
T5 213PS AWD AT
T5 245PS AWD AT
T5 254PS AT
T5 254PS AWD AT

Reviews

Neofiliac score33%45%21%
Pros
  • Good exterior styling
  • High cargo capacity
  • Reasonable drivetrain reliability
  • Good towing capacity
  • Very low official fuel consumption
  • Interesting I5 engine still available
  • Reasonably high reliability
  • Decent fit and finish
Cons
  • Poor performance
  • Mediocre build quality
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Very ugly
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • High 0.38 drag coefficient
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Basic suspension setup
  • Low cargo capacity
  • Can't go offroad
  • Rather uglified

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.