Compare Volvo C40 Recharge vs Mazda MX-30 (DR) vs Mazda CX-8 (KG)

Volvo C40 Recharge

Mazda MX-30 (DR)

Mazda CX-8 (KG)

Volvo C40 RechargeMazda MX-30 (DR)Mazda CX-8 (KG)
Variants
2.2d 4WD
2.2d
2.5
2.5T 4WD
2.5T

Reviews

Neofiliac score20%4%32%
Pros
  • Decent performance
  • Up to 420km electric range
  • Pay less tax
  • Good reliability
  • Good interior space
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Horrible hunchback crossover styling
  • Crossover nonsense
  • BEV nonsense
  • Rudimentary suspension setup
  • Bland styling
  • Not built for drivers
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.