Compare Hyundai Accent 5 vs Hyundai Accent RB vs Hyundai Elantra 5 MD
Variants
1.6
1.6 AT
1.6 CRDi
1.6 CRDi AT
1.6 Gamma
1.6 Gamma AT
1.6 Smartstream
1.6 Smartstream CVT
1.6 GDi AT
1.6 MPi
1.6 MPi AT
1.8
1.8 AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
388 L / 13.7 cu-ft
465 L / 16.4 cu-ft
419 L / 14.8 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
4.0 L / 4.2 qt
Fuel Capacity
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
43.0 L / 11.4 gal
48.0 L / 12.7 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 256 mm
Disc
Brakes | Rear
Disc, 262 mm
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Torsion
Torsion
Turning Circle
10.2 m / 33.5 ft
10.4 m / 34.1 ft
Construction
Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
140 mm / 5.5 in
Size | Height
1450 mm / 57.1 in
1435 mm / 56.5 in
Size | Length
4370 mm / 172.0 in
4529 mm / 178.3 in
Size | Width
1700 mm / 66.9 in
1775 mm / 69.9 in
Track Width | Front
1549.0 mm / 61.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1562.0 mm / 61.5 in
Wheelbase
2570 mm / 101.2 in
2700 mm / 106.3 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.28
Fuel Economy
7.1 L/100km / 33.1 MPG (combined) | 8.1 L/100km / 29.0 MPG (urban) | 5.9 L/100km / 39.9 MPG (highway)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
ULEV
Engine
G4NB
Engine | Bore
77.0 mm / 3.0 in
81.0 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.3:1
Engine | Displacement
1.6 L / 97.1 cu-in / 1591.0 cc
1.8 L / 109.7 cu-in / 1797.0 cc
Engine | Power
148.0 hp / 110.4 kW @ 6500 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
82.4 hp/L / 1.3 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
85.4 mm / 3.4 in
87.1 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Torque
178 Nm / 131.3 lb-ft @ 4700 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
6-speed
Production
Availability
2010 ~ 2018
2010 ~ 2015
Reviews
Neofiliac score
9%
9%
12%
Pros
- Small turning circle
- Small turning circle
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Improved styling
- Improved build quality
Cons
- Miserably low engine output
- Poor build quality
- No independent rear suspensions
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Not fully independent rear suspensions
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.