Compare Chevrolet Impala 10 vs Chevrolet Cruze 2 Sedan vs Chevrolet Evanda
Variants
2.4 Ecotec eAssist
2.5 Ecotec
3.6
1.4T
1.4T AT
1.6D
1.6D AT
2.0
2.0 AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
394 L / 13.9 cu-ft ~ 419 L / 14.8 cu-ft
435 L / 15.4 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
65.0 L / 17.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
490 kg / 1080 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
Independent, Spring MacPherson, with stabilizer
Spring Strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-dependent beam with stabilizer lateral stability, Trailing arm, Coil spring
Helical spring
Tire Size
235/50 R18, 245/45 R19, 245/40 R20
205/65 R16
Turning Circle
11.8 m / 38.5 ft
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
0.5 kWh (gross)
Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Size | Height
1496 mm / 58.9 in
1458 mm / 57.4 in
1440 mm / 56.7 in
Size | Length
5113 mm / 201.3 in
4666 mm / 183.7 in
4770 mm / 187.8 in
Size | Width
1854 mm / 73.0 in
1791 mm / 70.5 in
1815 mm / 71.5 in
Track Width | Front
1580.0 mm / 62.2 in
1527.0 mm / 60.1 in
1550.0 mm / 61.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1576.0 mm / 62.0 in
1552.0 mm / 61.1 in
1535.0 mm / 60.4 in
Weight
1422.0 kg / 3135.0 lbs
Wheel Size
18 in, 19 in, 20 in
16 in
Wheelbase
2837 mm / 111.7 in
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2700 mm / 106.3 in
Performance
Towing Capacity
454 kg / 1001 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.6:1
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 121.9 cu-in / 1998.0 cc
Engine | Power
131.0 hp / 97.7 kW @ 5400 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
65.6 hp/L / 1.1 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Torque
181 Nm / 133.5 lb-ft @ 4200 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Production
Availability
2016 ~ 2019
2004 ~ 2006
Reviews
Neofiliac score
42%
15%
11%
Pros
- Lots of space
- Improved exterior styling
- Decent comfort
- Easy to work on
- Modern design
Cons
- Poor handling
- Mediocre build quality
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with small engines
- Limited by MacPherson strut front suspensions
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.