Compare Chevrolet Impala 10 vs Chevrolet Evanda vs Chevrolet Cruze facelift
Variants
2.4 Ecotec eAssist
2.5 Ecotec
3.6
2.0
2.0 AT
1.4T
1.4T AT
1.7D
2.0D
2.0D AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
435 L / 15.4 cu-ft
469 L / 16.6 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
65.0 L / 17.2 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
490 kg / 1080 lbs
538 kg / 1186 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
Spring Strut
Independent, Spring MacPherson, with stabilizer
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Helical spring
Torsion
Tire Size
235/50 R18, 245/45 R19, 245/40 R20
205/65 R16
Turning Circle
11.8 m / 38.5 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
0.5 kWh (gross)
Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Size | Height
1496 mm / 58.9 in
1440 mm / 56.7 in
1477 mm / 58.1 in
Size | Length
5113 mm / 201.3 in
4770 mm / 187.8 in
4603 mm / 181.2 in
Size | Width
1854 mm / 73.0 in
1815 mm / 71.5 in
1797 mm / 70.7 in
Track Width | Front
1580.0 mm / 62.2 in
1550.0 mm / 61.0 in
1544.0 mm / 60.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1576.0 mm / 62.0 in
1535.0 mm / 60.4 in
1558.0 mm / 61.3 in
Weight
1422.0 kg / 3135.0 lbs
Wheel Size
18 in, 19 in, 20 in
16 in
Wheelbase
2837 mm / 111.7 in
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2685 mm / 105.7 in
Performance
Towing Capacity
454 kg / 1001 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Engine | Bore
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.6:1
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 121.9 cu-in / 1998.0 cc
Engine | Power
131.0 hp / 97.7 kW @ 5400 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
65.6 hp/L / 1.1 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Torque
181 Nm / 133.5 lb-ft @ 4200 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Production
Availability
2004 ~ 2006
2013 ~ 2016
Reviews
Neofiliac score
42%
11%
11%
Pros
- Lots of space
- Improved exterior styling
- Decent comfort
- Easy to work on
- Decent exterior design
Cons
- Poor handling
- Mediocre build quality
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with small engines
- Limited by MacPherson strut front suspensions
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.