Compare Skoda Superb 3 B8 (3V) facelift vs Ford Mondeo 4 Liftback facelift vs Ford Taurus 6 facelift

Skoda Superb 3 B8 (3V) facelift

Ford Mondeo 4 Liftback facelift

Ford Taurus 6 facelift

Skoda Superb 3 B8 (3V) faceliftFord Mondeo 4 Liftback faceliftFord Taurus 6 facelift
Variants
1.5 TSI
1.5 TSI DSG
1.6 TDI DSG
2.0 TDI 122 DSG
2.0 TDI 150
2.0 TDI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 190 AWD DSG
2.0 TDI 190 DSG
2.0 TDI 200 AWD DSG
2.0 TDI 200 DSG
2.0 TSI 190 DSG
2.0 TSI 272 AWD DSG
2.0 TSI 280 AWD DSG
1.4 TSI PHEV
1.5 EcoBoost 165
1.5 EcoBoost 165 AT
2.0 EcoBlue 120 AT
2.0 EcoBlue 150
2.0 EcoBlue 150 AT
2.0 EcoBlue 190 AT
2.0 EcoBlue 190 AWD AT
2.0T
3.5
3.5 AWD
SHO

Reviews

Neofiliac score42%31%23%
Pros
  • Good 0.26 drag coefficient
  • Down to very low 1.4L/100km fuel consumption (PHEV)
  • High cargo capacity
  • Decent drivetrain
  • Good power output
  • Lots of interior space
Cons
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • PHEV nonsense
  • Poor performance
  • Uglier and less practical than the standard sedan
  • Unreliable V6 engines (internal water pump)
  • Basic suspension setup
  • Generic exterior design

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.