Compare Skoda Superb 3 B8 (3V) facelift vs Volvo S40 II facelift vs Skoda Superb B5 (3U)

Skoda Superb 3 B8 (3V) facelift

Volvo S40 II facelift

Skoda Superb B5 (3U)

Skoda Superb 3 B8 (3V) faceliftVolvo S40 II faceliftSkoda Superb B5 (3U)
Variants
1.5 TSI
1.5 TSI DSG
1.6 TDI DSG
2.0 TDI 122 DSG
2.0 TDI 150
2.0 TDI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 190 AWD DSG
2.0 TDI 190 DSG
2.0 TDI 200 AWD DSG
2.0 TDI 200 DSG
2.0 TSI 190 DSG
2.0 TSI 272 AWD DSG
2.0 TSI 280 AWD DSG
1.4 TSI PHEV
1.6 100hp
1.6 101hp
1.6 D2
1.6 DRIVe
2.0 D3
2.0 D3 AT
2.0 D4
2.0 D4 AT
2.0 Euro4
2.0 Euro5
2.0 FLEXIFUEL
2.5T 230hp
2.5T AT
2.5T AWD
1.8T
1.9 TDI 101PS
1.9 TDI 131PS
2.0
2.0 TDI 140PS
2.5
2.5 AT
2.5 TDI
2.5 TDI AT
2.8
2.8 AT

Reviews

Neofiliac score42%36%29%
Pros
  • Good 0.26 drag coefficient
  • Down to very low 1.4L/100km fuel consumption (PHEV)
  • High cargo capacity
  • Down to very low 3.8L/100km fuel consumption
  • Quite reliable
  • Available with the famous Volvo T5
  • A cheaper way to get a B5.5 Passat
  • Lesser rear suspensions than the B5 Audi
Cons
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • PHEV nonsense
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Front-end a little ugly
  • Too closely associated with taxi

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.