Compare Skoda Octavia 4 vs Toyota Camry 6 facelift vs Toyota Avalon 1

Variants
1.0 TSI
1.0 TSI DSG
1.5 TGI
1.5 TGI DSG
1.5 TSI
1.5 TSI DSG
2.0 TDI 116
2.0 TDI 116 DSG
2.0 TDI 150
2.0 TDI 150 AWD DSG
2.0 TDI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 200 AWD DSG
2.0 TSI 190 AWD DSG
1.4 TSI PHEV
RS
2.4 Hybrid
2.5 169hp
2.5 179hp AT
3.5 AT

Capacity

Coolant Capacity
9.3 L / 9.8 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.7 L / 5.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
275 kg / 606 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
14.3 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
12.8 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Helical spring
Tire Size
205/65 R15 H
Turning Circle
11.0 m / 36.1 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
13.0 kWh (gross)
Body Style
4-door Sedan

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
143 mm / 5.6 in
Size | Height
1435 mm / 56.5 in
Size | Length
4806 mm / 189.2 in
4845 mm / 190.7 in
Size | Width
1829 mm / 72.0 in | 2003 mm / 78.9 in (mirror unfolded)
1785 mm / 70.3 in
Track Width | Front
1575.0 mm / 62.0 in
1545.0 mm / 60.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1565.0 mm / 61.6 in
1520.0 mm / 59.8 in
Weight
1470.0 kg / 3240.8 lbs
Wheelbase
2720 mm / 107.1 in

Performance

Fuel Economy
10.5 L/100km / 22.4 MPG (combined)
Towing Capacity
454 kg / 1001 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine
1MZ-FE
Engine | Bore
87.5 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.5:1
Engine | Displacement
3.0 L / 182.7 cu-in / 2994.0 cc
Engine | Power
200.0 hp / 149.1 kW @ 5400 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
66.8 hp/L / 1.1 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Torque
284 Nm / 209.5 lb-ft @ 4400 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V6 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
4-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic

Production

Availability
2009 ~ 2011
1994 ~ 2000

Reviews

Neofiliac score
37%
45%
17%
Pros
  • Excellent 0.24 drag coefficient
  • Down to very low 1.2L/100km fuel consumption (PHEV)
  • Small turning circle
  • Some towing capacity
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
  • Improved I4 engine
  • Newer 6-speed automatic transmissions for the I4s
  • Very reliable V6 engine
  • Clean styling
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • No powerful engine options
  • Boring

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.