Compare Skoda Octavia 4 vs Kia Optima 3 facelift vs Kia Optima 2

Variants
1.0 TSI
1.0 TSI DSG
1.5 TGI
1.5 TGI DSG
1.5 TSI
1.5 TSI DSG
2.0 TDI 116
2.0 TDI 116 DSG
2.0 TDI 150
2.0 TDI 150 AWD DSG
2.0 TDI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 200 AWD DSG
2.0 TSI 190 AWD DSG
1.4 TSI PHEV
RS
1.7 CRDi
1.7 CRDi AT
2.0 CVVT
2.0 CVVT AT
2.0 CVVT EcoDynamics
2.0 Hybrid
2.0 T-GDI AT
2.4 GDI AT
2.0
2.0 CRDi
2.7 AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
496 L / 17.5 cu-ft ~ 816 L / 28.8 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
6.8 L / 7.2 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.6 L / 4.9 qt
Fuel Capacity
62.0 L / 16.4 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
14.3 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
12.8 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
205/60 R16
Turning Circle
11.8 m / 38.7 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
13.0 kWh (gross)
Body Style
4-door Sedan

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
143 mm / 5.6 in
Size | Height
1455 mm / 57.3 in
1480 mm / 58.3 in
Size | Length
4845 mm / 190.7 in
4735 mm / 186.4 in
Size | Width
1829 mm / 72.0 in | 2003 mm / 78.9 in (mirror unfolded)
1830 mm / 72.0 in
1805 mm / 71.1 in
Track Width | Rear
1552.0 mm / 61.1 in
Wheelbase
2795 mm / 110.0 in
2720 mm / 107.1 in

Performance

Towing Capacity
650 kg / 1433 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1300 kg / 2866 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Euro 4
Engine
D4EA
Transmission | Gears
6-speed

Production

Availability
2010 ~ 2015
2005 ~ 2008

Reviews

Neofiliac score
37%
44%
37%
Pros
  • Excellent 0.24 drag coefficient
  • Down to very low 1.2L/100km fuel consumption (PHEV)
  • Small turning circle
  • Some towing capacity
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Good towing capacity
  • Reasonable exterior styling
  • Good towing capacity
  • More modern design
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.