Compare Skoda Octavia 4 vs Chevrolet Evanda vs Chevrolet Malibu 9

Variants
1.0 TSI
1.0 TSI DSG
1.5 TGI
1.5 TGI DSG
1.5 TSI
1.5 TSI DSG
2.0 TDI 116
2.0 TDI 116 DSG
2.0 TDI 150
2.0 TDI 150 AWD DSG
2.0 TDI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 200 AWD DSG
2.0 TSI 190 AWD DSG
1.4 TSI PHEV
RS
2.0
2.0 AT
1.5T
1.8 Hybrid EVT
2.0T

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
435 L / 15.4 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
65.0 L / 17.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
490 kg / 1080 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
14.3 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
12.8 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
Spring Strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Helical spring
Multi-link
Tire Size
205/65 R16
Turning Circle
11.5 m / 37.7 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
13.0 kWh (gross)
1.5 kWh (gross)
Body Style
4-door Sedan

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
143 mm / 5.6 in
Size | Height
1440 mm / 56.7 in
Size | Length
4770 mm / 187.8 in
4923 mm / 193.8 in
Size | Width
1829 mm / 72.0 in | 2003 mm / 78.9 in (mirror unfolded)
1815 mm / 71.5 in
1854 mm / 73.0 in
Track Width | Front
1550.0 mm / 61.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1535.0 mm / 60.4 in
Weight
1422.0 kg / 3135.0 lbs
Wheel Size
16 in
Wheelbase
2700 mm / 106.3 in

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.6:1
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 121.9 cu-in / 1998.0 cc
Engine | Power
131.0 hp / 97.7 kW @ 5400 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
65.6 hp/L / 1.1 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Torque
181 Nm / 133.5 lb-ft @ 4200 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder

Production

Availability
2004 ~ 2006
2016 ~ 2018

Reviews

Neofiliac score
37%
11%
34%
Pros
  • Excellent 0.24 drag coefficient
  • Down to very low 1.2L/100km fuel consumption (PHEV)
  • Small turning circle
  • Some towing capacity
  • Good exterior design
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • Limited by MacPherson strut front suspensions
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Uninspiring handling characteristics

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.